ArticleThe international journal of cardiovascular imaging2018
Influence of tube potential on quantitative coronary plaque analyses by low radiation dose computed tomography: a phantom study.
Article in The international journal of cardiovascular imaging, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Influencing factors and improvement methods of coronary artery plaque evaluation in CT.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2024Review
- Characteristics and evaluation of atherosclerotic plaques: an overview of state-of-the-art techniques.Frontiers in neurology · 2023Review
- Extraction of Coronary Atherosclerotic Plaques From Computed Tomography Imaging: A Review of Recent Methods.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Previous studies have shown that employing the low dose computed tomography (CT) technique based on low tube potential reduces the radiation dose required for the coronary artery examination protocol. However, low tube potential may adversely influence the CT number of plaque composition. Therefore, we aimed to determine whether quantitative atherosclerotic plaque analysis by a multi-slice, low radiation dose CT protocol using 80 kilovolts (kV) yields results comparable to those of the standard 120 kV protocol. Artificial plaque samples (n = 17) composed of three kinds of plaque were scanned at 120 and 80 kV. Relative low-density and medium-density plaque component volumes obtained by three protocols (80 kV, 60 Hounsfield units [HU] threshold; 120 kV, 60 HU threshold; and 80 kV, 82 HU threshold) were compared. Using the 60 HU threshold, relative volume of the low-density plaque component obtained at 80 kV was lower than that obtained at 120 kV (27 ± 3% vs. 51 ± 5%, P < 0.001), whereas relative volume of the medium-density plaque component obtained at 80 kV was higher than that obtained at 120 kV (73 ± 3% vs. 48 ± 5%, P < 0.001). By contrast, no significant difference in relative volume obtained at 80 kV (82 HU threshold) versus 120 kV (60 HU threshold) was observed for either low-density (52 ± 5% vs. 51 ± 5%) or medium-density (48 ± 5% vs. 48 ± 5%) plaque component. Low tube potential may affect the accuracy of quantitative atherosclerotic plaque analysis. For our phantom test, 82 HU was the optimal threshold for scanning at 80 kV.
Indexed as
Identifiers
29582238What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.