ArticleJapanese journal of ophthalmology2018
Evaluation of efficacy of infliximab for retinal vasculitis and extraocular symptoms in Behçet disease.
Article in Japanese journal of ophthalmology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Comparison of second-line therapy in IVIg-refractory Kawasaki disease: a systematic review.Pediatric rheumatology online journal · 2019Pooled it
- Treatment of non-infectious retinal vasculitis.Therapeutic advances in ophthalmologyReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeWe evaluated ocular symptoms and activity of retinal vasculitis of Behçet disease before and after infliximab therapy, using Behçet disease ocular attack score 24 (BOS24) and fluorescein angiography (FA) score. We also analyzed the efficacy of infliximab for ocular and extraocular symptoms. STUDY
designRetrospective study. SUBJECT AND
methodsUsing medical records, we analyzed FA and BOS24 to evaluate the association between the efficacy of infliximab therapy and FA as well as BOS24 scores. Further, we evaluated the association between FA scores and extraocular symptoms.
resultsAfter 2 years of infliximab therapy, 6-month BOS24 was significantly reduced compared to that before treatment (PreBOS24-6M). After 4 years of infliximab therapy, 6-month BOS24 was also significantly reduced compared to preBOS24-6M. After 2 years of infliximab therapy, FA score median (interquartile range) decreased significantly compared to that before treatment [FA-2Y vs. preFA: 0 (0-0) vs.15.5 (12-24); P < 0.0001; n = 38]. The FA-4Y score in subjects followed for at least 4 years was also significantly lower than the preFA score [0 (0-0) vs.16.5 (12-24.5); P < 0.0001; n = 28]. Among 38 patients, extraocular symptoms were resolved following treatment in 29 cases (76.3%). No significant correlation was observed between the improvement in FA-2Y and FA-4Y scores and the occurrence and persistence of extraocular symptoms (P = 0.33; n = 38 or P = 0.4; n = 28).
conclusionInfliximab therapy is effective for the treatment of ocular and extraocular involvement of Behçet disease. BOS24 and FA scores are useful for evaluating the efficacy of infliximab therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.