Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29582185›Full record

ReviewCurrent urology reports2018

Neuromodulation for Chronic Pelvic Pain.

Justina Tam, Charles Loeb, Daniel Grajower, Jason Kim, Steven Weissbart

Registry-linked trialAbstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current urology reports, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05851742 (Effects of Myofascial Release With and Without Electrical Stimulation on Pain and Functionality in Women With Chronic Pelvic Pain), which is not on this map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05851742 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

Effects of Myofascial Release With and Without Electrical Stimulation on Pain and Functionality in Women With Chronic Pelvic Pain

TypeinterventionalSponsorRiphah International UniversityRan2023 to 2023Enrolled24ConditionsChronic Pelvic Pain, Myofascial Trigger Point PainArmsTENS, Myofascial trigger point release
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Interventional treatment options for women with pelvic pain.Current physical medicine and rehabilitation reports · 2020
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Justina TamDepartment of Urology, Stony Brook Medicine, 101 Nicolls Road, HSC T9-090, Stony Brook, NY, 11794, USA. justina.tam@stonybrookmedicine.edu.
Charles LoebDepartment of Urology, Stony Brook Medicine, 101 Nicolls Road, HSC T9-090, Stony Brook, NY, 11794, USA.
Daniel GrajowerDepartment of Urology, Stony Brook Medicine, 101 Nicolls Road, HSC T9-090, Stony Brook, NY, 11794, USA.
Jason KimDepartment of Urology, Stony Brook Medicine, 101 Nicolls Road, HSC T9-090, Stony Brook, NY, 11794, USA.
Steven WeissbartDepartment of Urology, Stony Brook Medicine, 101 Nicolls Road, HSC T9-090, Stony Brook, NY, 11794, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewChronic pelvic pain is a heterogeneous condition that often requires multiple physician visits and various treatments prior to achieving an acceptable management strategy. Neuromodulation has been used to treat chronic pelvic pain that has failed other therapies. RECENT

findingsNumerous modalities of neuromodulation have been used to alleviate chronic pelvic pain with promising results. Numerous modalities of neuromodulation have demonstrated efficacy in the management of pelvic pain. Further investigation is needed to elucidate the most effective treatment modality and to identify the patients who would benefit most from this therapy.

Indexed as

Chronic PainHumansPelvic PainTranscutaneous Electric Nerve StimulationTreatment OutcomeChronic pelvic painNeuromodulationPTNSPudendal nerve stimulationSacral neuromodulationTENS

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.