Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29582001›Full record

ArticleAcademic pathology

A "Pathology Explanation Clinic (PEC)" for Patient-Centered Laboratory Medicine Test Results.

Blake Gibson, Erika Bracamonte, Elizabeth A Krupinski, Margaret M Briehl, Gail P Barker, John B Weinstein, Ronald S Weinstein

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Academic pathology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Blake GibsonDepartment of Pathology, College of Medicine-Tucson, The University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA.
Erika BracamonteDepartment of Pathology, College of Medicine-Tucson, The University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA.
Elizabeth A KrupinskiArizona Telemedicine Program, The University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA.
Margaret M BriehlDepartment of Pathology, College of Medicine-Tucson, The University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA.
Gail P BarkerArizona Telemedicine Program, The University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA.
John B WeinsteinBard Early Colleges, Bard College, Annandale-on-Hudson, NY, USA.
Ronald S WeinsteinDepartment of Pathology, College of Medicine-Tucson, The University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This concept paper addresses communication issues arising between physicians and their patients. To facilitate the communication of essential diagnostic pathology information to patients, and address their questions and concerns, we propose that "Pathology Explanation Clinics" be created. The Pathology Explanation Clinics would provide a channel for direct communications between pathologists and patients. Pathologists would receive special training as "Certified Pathologist Navigators" in preparation for this role. The goal of Pathology Explanation Clinics would be to help fill gaps in communication of information contained in laboratory reports to patients, further explain its relevance, and improve patient understanding of the meaning of such information and its impact on their health and health-care choices. Effort would be made to ensure that Certified Pathologist Navigators work within the overall coordination of care by the health-care team.

Indexed as

communicationlaboratory medicinepatient-centered careSecond Flexner Centurysurgical pathology

Identifiers

PMID29582001
PMCPMC5862367

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.