Article3 Biotech2018
Differential gene expression profiling through transcriptome approach of
Article in 3 Biotech, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
25 citing papers in PubMed, 63 citations in OpenAlex.
- Association of sugarcane cold tolerance with stem borer resistance.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Overexpression of Abiotic Stress-ResponsiveInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
- Identification of the Glyceraldehyde-3-Phosphate Dehydrogenase (Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Abiotic stress responses in forage crops and grasses: the role of secondary metabolites and biotechnological interventions.Frontiers in plant science · 2025Review
- Effect of PGPR on growth and nutrient utilization of Elymus nutans Griseb at different temperatures.PloS one · 2025Article
- Transgenic sugarcane overexpressing3 Biotech · 2024Article
- Isolation and Characterization ofPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Transgenic sugarcane with higher levels of BRK1 showed improved drought tolerance.Plant cell reports · 2023Article
- Isolation of 5' regulatory region of3 Biotech · 2023Article
- Transcriptomic and Proteomic Landscape of Sugarcane Response to Biotic and Abiotic Stressors.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Review
- Comparative physiological and transcriptome analysis in cultivated and wild sugarcane species in response to hydrogen peroxide-induced oxidative stress.BMC genomics · 2023Article
- Comparative transcriptome analysis reveals the regulatory mechanisms of two tropical water lilies in response to cold stress.BMC genomics · 2023Article
- Cold-Induced Physiological and Biochemical Alternations and Proteomic Insight into the Response ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2022Article
- Review
- Nanosilicon: An approach for abiotic stress mitigation and sustainable agriculture.Frontiers in plant science · 2022Review
- Comparative de novo transcriptome analysis identifies salinity stress responsive genes and metabolic pathways in sugarcane and its wild relative Erianthus arundinaceus [Retzius] Jeswiet.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- Physiological changes and transcriptome profiling in Saccharum spontaneum L. leaf under water stress and re-watering conditions.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- Regulation of Photosystem II Heterogeneity and Photochemistry in Two Cultivars of CFrontiers in plant science · 2021Article
- Current breeding and genomic approaches to enhance the cane and sugar productivity under abiotic stress conditions.3 Biotech · 2020Review
- Enhanced sugar accumulation and regulated plant hormone signalling genes contribute to cold tolerance in hypoploid Saccharum spontaneum.BMC genomics · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Sugarcane (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.