ArticleGut pathogens2018
The impact of
Article in Gut pathogens, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- Medicinal Plants and Their Impact on the Gut Microbiome in Mental Health: A Systematic Review.Nutrients · 2022Pooled it
- Rosavin improves insulin resistance and alleviates hepatic and kidney damageRSC medicinal chemistry · 2024Article
- Review
- Salidroside inhibits renal ischemia/reperfusion injury‑induced ferroptosis by the PI3K/AKT signaling pathway.Experimental and therapeutic medicine · 2023Article
- Article
- Recent trends in insect gut immunity.Frontiers in immunology · 2023Review
- The impact of Rhodiola rosea on biomarkers of diabetes, inflammation, and microbiota in a leptin receptor-knockout mouse model.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Antiaging Potential of Peptides from Underused Marine Bioresources.Marine drugs · 2021Review
- Improving natural product research translation: From source to clinical trial.FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe root extract of
results
conclusionsUnder standard and conventional rearing conditions, supplementation of
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.