ArticleJournal of physical therapy science2018
Changes in exercise tolerance and quality of life are unrelated in lung cancer survivors who undergo video-assisted thoracic surgery.
Article in Journal of physical therapy science, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- The impact of lung surgery, with or without (neo-)adjuvant therapy, on physical functioning in patients with nonsmall cell lung cancer: a scoping review.European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society · 2025Article
- A guide for managing patients with stage I NSCLC: deciding between lobectomy, segmentectomy, wedge, SBRT and ablation-part 2: systematic review of evidence regarding resection extent in generally healthy patients.Journal of thoracic disease · 2022Review
- Quality of life and lung function after pleurectomy/decortication for malignant pleural mesothelioma.Interactive cardiovascular and thoracic surgery · 2021Article
- Quality of Life After Stereotactic Body Radiation therapy Versus Video-Assisted Thoracic Surgery in Early stage Non-small Cell Lung Cancer. Is there Enough Data to Make a Recommendation?Journal of clinical and translational research · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
[Purpose] The associations between changes in respiratory function, exercise tolerance, and quality of life (QOL) in patients with lung cancer who undergo lobectomy using video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) are unclear. This study aimed to investigate the relationships between exercise tolerance and QOL in patients who underwent VATS. [Subjects and Methods] Thirty-six patients with lung cancer were followed for 3 months after VATS. Patients were evaluated before and 1, 4, and 12 weeks after surgery. Respiratory function, grip strength, and knee extension strength, as well as the results of timed up and go, 6-minute walk, and cardiopulmonary exercise tests, were evaluated using the 36-item short-form health survey. Longitudinal changes in physical performance and QOL were analyzed, as was the relationship between the change in physical function and QOL. [Results] The physical and social aspects of QOL significantly decreased at week 4 post-surgery, but recovered to pre-surgical levels by week 12. In contrast, physical (non-respiratory) function recovered to pre-surgical levels by week 4. There was no correlation between the percentages of change in QOL and those related to physical function. [Conclusion] Our preliminary study highlights the fact that early recovery of physical function is possible after VATS, but does not necessarily correlate with early QOL recovery. It is therefore necessary to perform perioperative interventions to promptly restore QOL after surgery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.