ArticleThe Ulster medical journal2017
Long Term Follow Up of Male Breast Cancer.
Article in The Ulster medical journal, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Outcomes of Rural Men with Breast Cancer: A Multicenter Population Based Retrospective Cohort Study.Cancers · 2023Article
- Clinicopathologic characteristics and prognosis for male breast cancer compared to female breast cancer.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Management and outcomes of men diagnosed with primary breast cancer.Breast cancer research and treatment · 2021Article
- Metastasis pattern and prognosis of male breast cancer patients in US: a population-based study from SEER database.Therapeutic advances in medical oncology · 2019Article
- A rare case of primary breast angiosarcoma in a male: a case report.BMC cancer · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionMale breast cancer accounts for less than 1% of breast cancers with published overall and disease free survival being lower than in females.
aimsTo determine treatment and long term outcomes for male breast cancer patients in our unit.
methodsA database has been maintained for all breast cancer patients diagnosed in our unit since 1993. Patients were identified using the database and information was collated on patient demographics, tumour pathology, treatment and outcomes using the database and retrospective chart review. Patients were followed to cause of death.
resultsFrom 1994-2009 twenty-four cancers were diagnosed in twenty-two patients. Mean age at diagnosis was 69. Male breast cancer patients were treated using similar principles to female breast cancer. Twenty patients underwent mastectomy, two patients underwent wide local excision. No patients developed local recurrence. One patient died from their breast cancer with systemic metastases. 10-year overall survival was 22%, 10 year disease-specific survival was 80%. Other causes of death included medical co-morbidity and secondary cancers. DISCUSSION: Disease free survival in our unit is comparable to other published studies. High age at diagnosis and co-morbidity are the most important factors in determining overall outcome. Treatment pathways for male breast cancer should follow guidelines for female disease in order to optimise outcomes. Future research at national or international level is necessary to ensure the most effective treatments are implemented for male breast cancer patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
29581629PMC5849974W2958903012What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.