ArticleScientific reports2018
Persistent random deformation model of cells crawling on a gel surface.
Article in Scientific reports, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.
- Long-Term Real-Time Tracking of Morphology and Migration of Neuronal Cells under Oxidative Stress.Chemical & biomedical imaging · 2025Article
- Random walk and cell morphology dynamics inFrontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2023Article
- Interplay among cell migration, shaping, and traction force on a matrix with cell-scale stiffness heterogeneity.Biophysics and physicobiology · 2022Article
- A formalism for modelling traction forces and cell shape evolution during cell migration in various biomedical processes.Biomechanics and modeling in mechanobiology · 2021Article
- A Novel Method for Effective Cell Segmentation and Tracking in Phase Contrast Microscopic Images.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Hierarchical Development of Motile Polarity in Durotactic Cells Just Crossing an Elasticity Boundary.Cell structure and function · 2020Article
- ABA/ASB biophysics and medicine session 2018.Biophysical reviews · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In general, cells move on a substrate through extension and contraction of the cell body. Though cell movement should be explained by taking into account the effect of such shape fluctuations, past approaches to formulate cell-crawling have not sufficiently quantified the relationship between cell movement (velocity and trajectory) and shape fluctuations based on experimental data regarding actual shaping dynamics. To clarify this relationship, we experimentally characterized cell-crawling in terms of shape fluctuations, especially extension and contraction, by using an elasticity-tunable gel substrate to modulate cell shape. As a result, an amoeboid swimmer-like relation was found to arise between the cell velocity and cell-shape dynamics. To formulate this experimentally-obtained relationship between cell movement and shaping dynamics, we established a persistent random deformation (PRD) model based on equations of a deformable self-propelled particle adopting an amoeboid swimmer-like velocity-shape relationship. The PRD model successfully explains the statistical properties of velocity, trajectory and shaping dynamics of the cells including back-and-forth motion, because the velocity equation exhibits time-reverse symmetry, which is essentially different from previous models. We discuss the possible application of this model to classify the phenotype of cell migration based on the characteristic relation between movement and shaping dynamics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.