Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29581401›Full record

ArticlePhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences2018

Migration in the Anthropocene: how collective navigation, environmental system and taxonomy shape the vulnerability of migratory species.

Molly Hardesty-Moore, Stefanie Deinet, Robin Freeman, Georgia C Titcomb, Erin M Dillon, Keenan Stears, Maggie Klope, An Bui, Devyn Orr, Hillary S Young and 3 more

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Avian migration clocks in a changing world.Journal of comparative physiology. A, Neuroethology, sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology · 2024
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Integrating behaviour and ecology into global biodiversity conservation strategies.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2019
    Article
  10. Inferring the rules of social interaction in migrating caribou.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2018
    Article
  11. Collective movement in ecology: from emerging technologies to conservation and management.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2018
    Article
  12. From single steps to mass migration: the problem of scale in the movement ecology of the Serengeti wildebeest.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2018
    Article
  13. Fitness trade-offs of group formation and movement by Thomson's gazelles in the Serengeti ecosystem.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2018
    Article
  14. Collective animal navigation and migratory culture: from theoretical models to empirical evidence.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2018
    Review
  15. Eco-evolutionary dynamics, density-dependent dispersal and collective behaviour: implications for salmon metapopulation robustness.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Molly Hardesty-MooreDepartment of Ecology, Evolution, and Marine Biology, University of California, Santa Barbara, CA 93106, USA molly.hardesty-moore@lifesci.ucsb.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-0961-5832
Stefanie DeinetMarine Science Institute, University of California, Santa Barbara, CA 93106, USA.
Robin FreemanMarine Science Institute, University of California, Santa Barbara, CA 93106, USA.
Georgia C TitcombDepartment of Ecology, Evolution, and Marine Biology, University of California, Santa Barbara, CA 93106, USA.
Erin M DillonDepartment of Ecology, Evolution, and Marine Biology, University of California, Santa Barbara, CA 93106, USA.
Keenan StearsDepartment of Ecology, Evolution, and Marine Biology, University of California, Santa Barbara, CA 93106, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1012-5838
Maggie KlopeDepartment of Ecology, Evolution, and Marine Biology, University of California, Santa Barbara, CA 93106, USA.
An BuiDepartment of Ecology, Evolution, and Marine Biology, University of California, Santa Barbara, CA 93106, USA.
Devyn OrrDepartment of Ecology, Evolution, and Marine Biology, University of California, Santa Barbara, CA 93106, USA.
Hillary S YoungDepartment of Ecology, Evolution, and Marine Biology, University of California, Santa Barbara, CA 93106, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0449-8582
Ana Miller-Ter KuileDepartment of Ecology, Evolution, and Marine Biology, University of California, Santa Barbara, CA 93106, USA.
Lacey F HugheyDepartment of Ecology, Evolution, and Marine Biology, University of California, Santa Barbara, CA 93106, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8911-4001
Douglas J McCauleyDepartment of Ecology, Evolution, and Marine Biology, University of California, Santa Barbara, CA 93106, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8100-653X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent increases in human disturbance pose significant threats to migratory species using collective movement strategies. Key threats to migrants may differ depending on behavioural traits (e.g. collective navigation), taxonomy and the environmental system (i.e. freshwater, marine or terrestrial) associated with migration. We quantitatively assess how collective navigation, taxonomic membership and environmental system impact species' vulnerability by (i) evaluating population change in migratory and non-migratory bird, mammal and fish species using the Living Planet Database (LPD), (ii) analysing the role of collective navigation and environmental system on migrant extinction risk using International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) classifications and (iii) compiling literature on geographical range change of migratory species. Likelihood of population decrease differed by taxonomic group: migratory birds were more likely to experience annual declines than non-migrants, while mammals displayed the opposite pattern. Within migratory species in IUCN, we observed that collective navigation and environmental system were important predictors of extinction risk for fishes and birds, but not for mammals, which had overall higher extinction risk than other taxa. We found high phylogenetic relatedness among collectively navigating species, which could have obscured its importance in determining extinction risk. Overall, outputs from these analyses can help guide strategic interventions to conserve the most vulnerable migrations.This article is part of the theme issue 'Collective movement ecology'.

Indexed as

Animal MigrationEnvironmentSpatial NavigationAnimalsBirdsFishesMammalsPhylogenybirdscollective navigationfishesliving planet databasemammalsmigration

Identifiers

PMID29581401
PMCPMC5882986

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.