Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29581400›Full record

ArticlePhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences2018

Using activity and sociability to characterize collective motion.

David J T Sumpter, Alex Szorkovszky, Alexander Kotrschal, Niclas Kolm, James E Herbert-Read

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Collective movement in ecology: from emerging technologies to conservation and management.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2018
    Article
  15. Challenges and solutions for studying collective animal behaviour in the wild.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2018
    Review
  16. Migration in the Anthropocene: how collective navigation, environmental system and taxonomy shape the vulnerability of migratory species.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2018
    Article
  17. Relative telencephalon size does not affect collective motion in the guppy (Behavioral ecology : official journal of the International Society for Behavioral Ecology
    Article
  18. Inbreeding strategies under social and sexual complexity: insights from female and male guppies.Behavioral ecology : official journal of the International Society for Behavioral Ecology
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

David J T SumpterMathematics Department, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden david.sumpter@math.uu.se.ORCID 0000-0002-1436-9103
Alex SzorkovszkyMathematics Department, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0001-9331-3214
Alexander KotrschalZoology Department, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0003-3473-1402
Niclas KolmZoology Department, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden.
James E Herbert-ReadZoology Department, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0003-0243-4518

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A wide range of measurements can be made on the collective motion of groups, and the movement of individuals within them. These include, but are not limited to: group size, polarization, speed, turning speed, speed or directional correlations, and distances to near neighbours. From an ecological and evolutionary perspective, we would like to know which of these measurements capture biologically meaningful aspects of an animal's behaviour and contribute to its survival chances. Previous simulation studies have emphasized two main factors shaping individuals' behaviour in groups; attraction and alignment. Alignment responses appear to be important in transferring information between group members and providing synergistic benefits to group members. Likewise, attraction to conspecifics is thought to provide benefits through, for example, selfish herding. Here, we use a factor analysis on a wide range of simple measurements to identify two main axes of collective motion in guppies (

Indexed as

MovementSocial BehaviorAnimalsFemaleFishesFood ChainMalePoeciliaPredatory Behaviorcollective behaviourfactor analysisfishPoecilia reticulata, personality

Identifiers

PMID29581400
PMCPMC5882985

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.