Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29581393›Full record

ReviewPhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences2018

The importance of individual variation in the dynamics of animal collective movements.

Maria Del Mar Delgado, Maria Miranda, Silvia J Alvarez, Eliezer Gurarie, William F Fagan, Vincenzo Penteriani, Agustina di Virgilio, Juan Manuel Morales

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed
10.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed, 98 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. From Lévy walks to Brownian motion in schools of zebrafish (Danio rerio).The European physical journal. E, Soft matter · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Trait-based approaches to restoration ecology: Synthesizing insights from diverse systems.Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Agents seeking long-term access to the wisdom of the crowd reduce immediate decision-making accuracy.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2024
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Dynamic Leadership Mechanism in Homing Pigeon Flocks.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Cascading indirect genetic effects in a clonal vertebrate.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2022
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Maria Del Mar DelgadoResearch Unit of Biodiversity (UMIB, UO-CSIC-PA), Oviedo University, Campus Mieres, 33600 Mieres, Spain delgado.mmar@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0002-3009-738X
Maria MirandaResearch Unit of Biodiversity (UMIB, UO-CSIC-PA), Oviedo University, Campus Mieres, 33600 Mieres, Spain.
Silvia J AlvarezDepartment of Biology, University of Maryland, 1210 Biology-Psychology Building, College Park, MD 20742, USA.
Eliezer GurarieDepartment of Biology, University of Maryland, 1210 Biology-Psychology Building, College Park, MD 20742, USA.
William F FaganDepartment of Biology, University of Maryland, 1210 Biology-Psychology Building, College Park, MD 20742, USA.
Vincenzo PenterianiResearch Unit of Biodiversity (UMIB, UO-CSIC-PA), Oviedo University, Campus Mieres, 33600 Mieres, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-9333-7846
Agustina di VirgilioEcotono, INIBIOMA-CONICET, Universidad Nacional del Camahue, Quintral 1250, Bariloche 8400, Argentina.
Juan Manuel MoralesEcotono, INIBIOMA-CONICET, Universidad Nacional del Camahue, Quintral 1250, Bariloche 8400, Argentina.ORCID 0000-0001-7269-7490
Universidad de Oviedo · ESConsejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas · ARUniversity of Maryland, College Park · USThe Nature Conservancy · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Animal collective movements are a key example of a system that links two clearly defined levels of organization: the individual and the group. Most models investigating collective movements have generated coherent collective behaviours without the inclusion of individual variability. However, new individual-based models, together with emerging empirical information, emphasize that within-group heterogeneity may strongly influence collective movement behaviour. Here we (i) review the empirical evidence for individual variation in animal collective movements, (ii) explore how theoretical investigations have represented individual heterogeneity when modelling collective movements and (iii) present a model to show how within-group heterogeneity influences the collective properties of a group. Our review underscores the need to consider variability at the level of the individual to improve our understanding of how individual decision rules lead to emergent movement patterns, and also to yield better quantitative predictions of collective behaviour.This article is part of the theme issue 'Collective movement ecology'.

Indexed as

Behavior, AnimalMovementSocial BehaviorAnimalsEcologyEthologyModels, Biologicalaggregationbehavioural rulescollective motioncontext-dependent factorsLagrangian models

Identifiers

PMID29581393
PMCPMC5882978
OpenAlexW2792114288

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.