Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29581311›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2018

Processes and patterns of interaction as units of selection: An introduction to ITSNTS thinking.

W Ford Doolittle, S Andrew Inkpen

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 54 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
54citing papers in PubMed
41.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

54 citing papers in PubMed, 178 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Jumbo phage-mediated transduction of genomic islands.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Overlapping attempts to falsify and Darwinize the Gaia hypothesis.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2025
    Review
  13. Chance and purpose in the evolution of biospheres.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2025
    Article
  14. Function, chance and purpose in the biosphere: a critical examination of the Darwinized Gaia hypothesis.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2025
    Review
  15. Darwinizing Gaia: conceptual approaches.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2025
    Review
  16. The evolution of Gaia(s).Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2025
    Review
  17. Microorganisms · 2025
    Article
  18. Persistence selection between simulated biogeochemical cycle variants for their distinct effects on the Earth system.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

W Ford DoolittleDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS B3H 4R2, Canada; ford@dal.ca.
S Andrew InkpenDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS B3H 4R2, Canada.
Dalhousie University · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Many practicing biologists accept that nothing in their discipline makes sense except in the light of evolution, and that natural selection is evolution's principal sense-maker. But what natural selection actually is (a force or a statistical outcome, for example) and the levels of the biological hierarchy (genes, organisms, species, or even ecosystems) at which it operates directly are still actively disputed among philosophers and theoretical biologists. Most formulations of evolution by natural selection emphasize the differential reproduction of entities at one or the other of these levels. Some also recognize differential persistence, but in either case the focus is on lineages of material things: even species can be thought of as spatiotemporally restricted, if dispersed, physical beings. Few consider-as "units of selection" in their own right-the processes implemented by genes, cells, species, or communities. "It's the song not the singer" (ITSNTS) theory does that, also claiming that evolution by natural selection of processes is more easily understood and explained as differential persistence than as differential reproduction. ITSNTS was formulated as a response to the observation that the collective functions of microbial communities (the songs) are more stably conserved and ecologically relevant than are the taxa that implement them (the singers). It aims to serve as a useful corrective to claims that "holobionts" (microbes and their animal or plant hosts) are aggregate "units of selection," claims that often conflate meanings of that latter term. But ITSNS also seems broadly applicable, for example, to the evolution of global biogeochemical cycles and the definition of ecosystem function.

Indexed as

Genetics, PopulationModels, GeneticAdaptation, PhysiologicalAnimalsBiological Variation, IndividualCell LineageEcologyGene Regulatory NetworksGenesGenetic LinkageGenetic VariationMetaphysicsMicrobial InteractionsMicrobiotaPlantsReproductionevolutionmicrobiomenatural selectionpersistenceprocess

Identifiers

PMID29581311
PMCPMC5910863
OpenAlexW2792882325

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.