Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29581128›Full record

ArticleThe British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners2018

Improving palliative care provision in primary care: a pre- and post-survey evaluation among PaTz groups.

Annicka Gm van der Plas, H Roeline W Pasman, Bart Schweitzer, Bregje D Onwuteaka-Philipsen

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. The Organization of Home Palliative Cancer Care by Primary Health Care: A Systematic Review Protocol.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Supporting GPs around euthanasia requests from people with dementia: a qualitative analysis of Dutch nominal group meetings.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2020
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Annicka Gm van der PlasDepartment of Public and Occupational Health, Expertise Center for Palliative Care, and Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam.
H Roeline W PasmanDepartment of Public and Occupational Health, Expertise Center for Palliative Care, and Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam.
Bart SchweitzerDepartment of Public and Occupational Health, Expertise Center for Palliative Care, and Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, and PaTz Foundation, Amsterdam.
Bregje D Onwuteaka-PhilipsenDepartment of Public and Occupational Health, Expertise Center for Palliative Care, and Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, and PaTz Foundation, Amsterdam.
Amsterdam Public Health · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn PaTz (PAlliatieve Thuis Zorg, palliative care at home), modelled after the Gold Standards Framework, GPs and community nurses meet on a regular basis to identify patients with palliative care needs (the PaTz register), and to discuss care for these patients.

aimTo study the effects of the implementation of PaTz, and provide additional analyses on two important elements: the PaTz register and patient discussions. DESIGN AND

settingA pre- and post-evaluation among Dutch GPs (

methodGPs from all 37 PaTz groups filled in questionnaires. Pre- and post-test differences were analysed using multilevel analyses to adjust for PaTz group.

resultsIdentification of patients with palliative care needs was done systematically for more patients after implementation of PaTz compared with before (54.3% versus 17.6%). After implementation, 64.8% of deceased patients had been included on the PaTz register. For these patients, when compared with patients not included on the PaTz register, preferred place of death was more likely to be known (88.1% of patients not on the register and 97.3% of deceased patients included on the register), GPs were more likely to have considered a possible death sooner (>1 month before death: 53.0% and 80.2%), and conversations on life expectancy, physical complaints, existential issues, and possibilities of care occurred more often (60.8% and 81.3%; 68.6% and 86.1%; 22.5% and 34.2%; 60.8% and 84.0%, respectively).

conclusionsImplementation of PaTz improved systematic identification of palliative care patients within the GP practice. Use of the PaTz register has added value.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overFemaleFocus GroupsHealth Services ResearchHome Care ServicesHumansInterdisciplinary CommunicationMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasmsNetherlandsPalliative CarePrimary Health CareSocial Supportend-of-life carehealthcare surveysinterprofessional relationspalliative careprimary care physicianprimary health care

Identifiers

PMID29581128
PMCPMC5916082
OpenAlexW2790091617

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.