ArticleThe British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners2018
Improving palliative care provision in primary care: a pre- and post-survey evaluation among PaTz groups.
Article in The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- Palliative care provision for children in general practice: A retrospective cohort study.Palliative & supportive care · 2026Article
- Being Seen as a Unique Person is Essential in Palliative Care at Home and Nursing Homes: A Qualitative Study With Patients and Relatives.The American journal of hospice & palliative care · 2025Article
- The Organization of Home Palliative Cancer Care by Primary Health Care: A Systematic Review Protocol.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023Article
- Healthcare professionals' perceived barriers in providing palliative care in primary care and nursing homes: a survey study.Palliative care and social practice · 2023Article
- Supporting GPs around euthanasia requests from people with dementia: a qualitative analysis of Dutch nominal group meetings.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2020Article
- Physicians' perspectives on estimating and communicating prognosis in palliative care: a cross-sectional survey.BJGP open · 2020Article
- Variation in the implementation of PaTz: a method to improve palliative care in general practice - a prospective observational study.BMC palliative care · 2020Observational
- The association between PaTz and improved palliative care in the primary care setting: a cross-sectional survey.BMC family practice · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIn PaTz (PAlliatieve Thuis Zorg, palliative care at home), modelled after the Gold Standards Framework, GPs and community nurses meet on a regular basis to identify patients with palliative care needs (the PaTz register), and to discuss care for these patients.
aimTo study the effects of the implementation of PaTz, and provide additional analyses on two important elements: the PaTz register and patient discussions. DESIGN AND
settingA pre- and post-evaluation among Dutch GPs (
methodGPs from all 37 PaTz groups filled in questionnaires. Pre- and post-test differences were analysed using multilevel analyses to adjust for PaTz group.
resultsIdentification of patients with palliative care needs was done systematically for more patients after implementation of PaTz compared with before (54.3% versus 17.6%). After implementation, 64.8% of deceased patients had been included on the PaTz register. For these patients, when compared with patients not included on the PaTz register, preferred place of death was more likely to be known (88.1% of patients not on the register and 97.3% of deceased patients included on the register), GPs were more likely to have considered a possible death sooner (>1 month before death: 53.0% and 80.2%), and conversations on life expectancy, physical complaints, existential issues, and possibilities of care occurred more often (60.8% and 81.3%; 68.6% and 86.1%; 22.5% and 34.2%; 60.8% and 84.0%, respectively).
conclusionsImplementation of PaTz improved systematic identification of palliative care patients within the GP practice. Use of the PaTz register has added value.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.