Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29581090›Full record

ArticleJMIR cancer2018

Implications of Patient Portal Transparency in Oncology: Qualitative Interview Study on the Experiences of Patients, Oncologists, and Medical Informaticists.

Jordan M Alpert, Bonny B Morris, Maria D Thomson, Khalid Matin, Richard F Brown

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR cancer, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Cancer Education in the Era of Immediate Results Access.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2026
    Article
  4. The Effects of an Online Patient Portal on Nurses' and the Health Care Team's Work in an Outpatient Oncology Setting: A Qualitative Study.The Canadian journal of nursing research = Revue canadienne de recherche en sciences infirmieres · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Improving transparency and empowerment for cancer patients by accessing their full online personal medical records.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Physicians' Perspectives on Inpatient Portals: Systematic Review.Interactive journal of medical research · 2022
    Review
  16. Digital Health Applications in Oncology: An Opportunity to Seize.Journal of the National Cancer Institute · 2022
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jordan M AlpertDepartment of Advertising, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7066-4748
Bonny B Morris *Department of Health Behavior and Policy, Virginia Commonwealth University School of Medicine, Richmond, VA, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3345-1276
Maria D Thomson *Department of Health Behavior and Policy, Virginia Commonwealth University School of Medicine, Richmond, VA, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5729-8720
Khalid Matin *Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Virginia Commonwealth University School of Medicine, Richmond, VA, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5368-052X
Richard F Brown *Department of Health Behavior and Policy, Virginia Commonwealth University School of Medicine, Richmond, VA, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3150-6958

Funding

Training Program in Behavioral and Health Services Cancer Control ResearchR25CA093423 · NCI · VIRGINIA COMMONWEALTH UNIVERSITY · PI BROWN, RICHARD FREDERICK · 2002 to 2015
$2.9M
NCI NIH HHS R25 CA093423
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundProviding patients with unrestricted access to their electronic medical records through patient portals has impacted patient-provider communication and patients' personal health knowledge. However, little is known about how patient portals are used in oncology.

objectiveThe aim of this study was to understand attitudes of the portal's adoption for oncology and to identify the advantages and disadvantages of using the portal to communicate and view medical information.

methodsIn-depth semistructured interviews were conducted with 60 participants: 35 patients, 13 oncologists, and 12 medical informaticists. Interviews were recorded, transcribed, and thematically analyzed to identify critical incidents and general attitudes encountered by participants.

resultsTwo primary themes were discovered: (1) implementation practices influence attitudes, in which the decision-making and execution process of introducing portals throughout the hospital did not include the input of oncologists. Lack of oncologists' involvement led to a lack of knowledge about portal functionality, such as not knowing the time period when test results would be disclosed to patients; (2) perceptions of portals as communication tools varies by user type, meaning that each participant group (patients, oncologists, and medical informaticists) had varied opinions about how the portal should be used to transmit and receive information. Oncologists and medical informaticists had difficulty understanding one another's culture and communication processes in their fields, while patients had preferences for how they would like to receive communication, but it largely depended upon the type of test being disclosed.

conclusionsThe majority of patients (54%, 19/35) who participated in this study viewed lab results or scan reports via the portal before being contacted by a clinician. Most were relatively comfortable with this manner of disclosure but still preferred face-to-face or telephone communication. Findings from this study indicate that portal education is needed for both patients and oncologists, especially when portals are implemented across entire health systems since highly specialized areas of medicine may have unique needs and uses. Patient portals in oncology can potentially alter the way diagnoses are delivered and how patients and oncologists communicate. Therefore, communication about the portal should be established during initial consultations so patients can decide whether they want to be informed in such a manner.

Indexed as

electronic health recordhealth communicationpatient portalsphysician patient relationshipqualitative research

Identifiers

PMID29581090
PMCPMC5891668

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.