Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29581034›Full record

Trial reportJournal of pain and symptom management2018

Preference for Palliative Care in Cancer Patients: Are Men and Women Alike?

Fahad Saeed, Michael Hoerger, Sally A Norton, Elizabeth Guancial, Ronald M Epstein, Paul R Duberstein

Open access · bronzeAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of pain and symptom management, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 59 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
59citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
8.0field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

59 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 117 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Missed opportunities: delayed in-hospital palliative care consultations in patients with non-metastatic cancers.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Fahad SaeedDivision of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, New York, USA; Division of Palliative Care, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, New York, USA. Electronic address: fahad_saeed@urmc.rochester.edu.
Michael HoergerDepartment of Psychology, Tulane University, New Orleans, Louisiana.
Sally A NortonDivision of Palliative Care, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, New York, USA; School of Nursing, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, New York, USA.
Elizabeth GuancialDivision of Hematology Oncology, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, New York, USA.
Ronald M EpsteinDivision of Palliative Care, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, New York, USA; Department of Psychiatry, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, New York, USA; Department of Family Medicine and Center for Center for Communication and Disparities Research, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, New York, USA.
Paul R DubersteinDivision of Palliative Care, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, New York, USA; Department of Psychiatry, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, New York, USA; Department of Family Medicine and Center for Center for Communication and Disparities Research, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, New York, USA.
University of Rochester · USTulane University · USUniversity of Rochester Medical Center · US

Funding

Tracking & Evaluation CoreU54GM104940 · NIGMS · LSU PENNINGTON BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH CTR · PI Leigh Lamonica · 2012 to 2026
$69.1M
RCT of Patient, Caregiver and Physician Communication Coaching in Advanced CancerR01CA140419 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER · PI EPSTEIN, RONALD M., KRAVITZ, RICHARD L · 2011 to 2015
$2.7M
Impact of a Novel Cancer Communication Intervention on Caregiver BereavementR01CA168387 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER · PI DUBERSTEIN, PAUL R, PRIGERSON, HOLLY GWEN · 2013 to 2017
$2.6M
Social and behavioral influences on clinical communication and pain managementR01CA155376 · NCI · PURDUE UNIVERSITY · PI EPSTEIN, RONALD M., SHIELDS, CLEVELAND GEORGE · 2011 to 2015
$2.6M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA140419NCI NIH HHS R01 CA155376NCI NIH HHS R01 CA168387NIGMS NIH HHS U54 GM104940
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

contextMen and those with low educational attainment are less likely to receive palliative care. Understanding these disparities is a high priority issue.

objectivesIn this study of advanced cancer patients, we hypothesized that men and those with lower levels of educational attainment would have less favorable attitudes toward palliative care.

methodsWe performed a cross-sectional analysis of data collected from 383 patients at study entry in the Values and Options in Cancer Care (VOICE) clinical trial. Patients were asked about their preferences for palliative care if their oncologist informed them that further treatment would not be helpful. Palliative care was defined as "comfort care" that focuses on "quality of life, but not a cure." Response options were definitely no, possibly no, unsure, possibly yes, and definitely yes. Those preferring palliative care (definitely or possibly yes) were compared to all others. Predictors were patient gender and education level. Covariates included age, race, disease aggressiveness, and financial strain.

resultsWomen were more likely [odds ratio (95% CI)] than men to prefer palliative care [3.07 (1.80-5.23)]. The effect of education on preferences for palliative care was not statistically significant [0.85 (0.48-1.48)].

conclusionSignificant gender differences in patients' preferences for palliative care could partially account for gender disparities in end-of-life care. Interventions to promote palliative care among men could reduce these disparities.

Indexed as

Patient PreferenceAdultAgedAged, 80 and overCross-Sectional StudiesEducational StatusFemaleHealthcare DisparitiesHealth CommunicationHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHospice CareHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasmsPalliative Careageattitudescancereducationgender differencesoncologyPalliative caretreatment preference

Identifiers

PMID29581034
PMCPMC6015521
OpenAlexW2791577672

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.