ArticleTrials2018
Systematic Techniques to Enhance rEtention in Randomised controlled trials: the STEER study protocol.
Article in Trials, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Pooled it
- Assessing effective interventions to improve trial retention: do they contain behaviour change techniques?Trials · 2020Pooled it
- Pooled it
- What influences communication about retention in randomised trials: a multi-trial, theory-based analysis exploring trial staff perspectives.BMC medical research methodology · 2022Trial
- Navigating Real-World Randomized Clinical Trials: The 'Parents as Teachers' Experience.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2024Article
- Optimizing Teamwork in the Operating Room: A Scoping Review of Actionable Teamwork Strategies.Cureus · 2024Article
- Article
- Behavioural approaches to recruitment and retention in clinical trials: a systematic mapping review.BMJ open · 2022Article
- Development of a theory-informed questionnaire to assess the acceptability of healthcare interventions.BMC health services research · 2022Article
- Article
- Recruitment and retention of participants in UK surgical trials: survey of key issues reported by trial staff.BJS open · 2020Article
- Developing a roadmap to improve trial delivery for under-served groups: results from a UK multi-stakeholder process.Trials · 2020Article
- Retaining participants in community-based health research: a case example on standardized planning and reporting.Trials · 2020Review
- Acceptability of nurse-led reviews for inflammatory rheumatological conditions: A qualitative study.Journal of multimorbidity and comorbidityArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundNon-retention of participants seriously affects the credibility of clinical trial results and significantly reduces the potential of a trial to influence clinical practice. Non-retention can be defined as instances where participants leave the study prematurely. Examples include withdrawal of consent and loss to follow-up and thus outcome data cannot be obtained. The majority of existing interventions targeting retention fail to describe any theoretical basis for the observed improvement, or lack of improvement. Moreover, most of these interventions lack involvement of participants in their conception and/or design, raising questions about their relevance and acceptability. Many of the causes of non-retention involve people performing a behaviour (e.g. not returning a questionnaire). Behaviour change is difficult, and the importance of a strong theoretical basis for interventions that aim to change behaviour is increasingly recognised. This research aims to develop and pilot theoretically informed, participant-centred, evidence-based behaviour change interventions to improve retention in trials.
methodsThis research will generate data through semi-structured interviews on stakeholders' perspectives of the reasons for trial non-retention. It will identify perceived barriers and enablers to trial retention using the Theoretical Domains Framework. The intervention development work will involve identification of behaviour change techniques, using recognised methodology, and co-production of retention interventions through discussion groups with end-users. An evaluation of intervention acceptability and feasibility will be conducted in focus groups. Finally, a ready-to-use evaluation framework to deploy in Studies Within A Trial as well as an explanatory retention framework will be developed for identifying and tackling modifiable issues to improve trial retention. DISCUSSION: We believe this to be one of the first studies to apply a theoretical lens to the development of interventions to improve trial retention that have been informed by, and are embedded within, participants' experiential accounts. By developing and identifying priority interventions this study will support efforts to reduce research waste.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.