Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29580251›Full record

SynthesisBMC health services research2018

Defining the external implementation context: an integrative systematic literature review.

Dennis P Watson, Erin L Adams, Sarah Shue, Heather Coates, Alan McGuire, Jeremy Chesher, Joanna Jackson, Ogbonnaya I Omenka

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMC health services research, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 49 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
49citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

49 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Dennis P WatsonDepartment of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Indiana University Richard M. Fairbanks School of Public Health, 1050 Wishard Blvd, Indianapolis, IN, 46202, USA. dpwatson@iu.edu.
Erin L AdamsDepartment of Psychology, Indiana University Purdue University-Indianapolis, 420 N Blackford St, Indianapolis, IN, 46202, USA.
Sarah ShueIndiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis, School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, 1050 Wishard Blvd, Indianapolis, IN, 46202, USA.
Heather CoatesIndiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis, University Library, Center for Digital Scholarship, 755 W. Michigan St, Indianapolis, IN, 46202, USA.
Alan McGuireRichard L. Roudebush VA, 1481 W. 10th St, Indianapolis, IN, 46202, USA.
Jeremy ChesherDepartment of Environmental Health Sciences, Indiana University Richard M. Fairbanks School of Public Health, 1050 Wishard Blvd, Indianapolis, IN, 46202, USA.
Joanna JacksonDepartment of Health Policy and Management, Indiana University Richard M. Fairbanks School of Public Health, 1050 Wishard Blvd, Indianapolis, IN, 46202, USA.
Ogbonnaya I OmenkaDepartment of Health Policy and Management, Indiana University Richard M. Fairbanks School of Public Health, 1050 Wishard Blvd, Indianapolis, IN, 46202, USA.

Funding

Pilot Testing of an E-Learning Strategy for Housing First ImplementationR34DA036001 · NIDA · INDIANA UNIVERSITY INDIANAPOLIS · PI WATSON, DENNIS PAUL · 2014 to 2016
$633k
NIDA NIH HHS R34 DA036001NIDA NIH HHS R34DA036001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundProper implementation of evidence-based interventions is necessary for their full impact to be realized. However, the majority of research to date has overlooked facilitators and barriers existing outside the boundaries of the implementing organization(s). Better understanding and measurement of the external implementation context would be particularly beneficial in light of complex health interventions that extend into and interact with the larger environment they are embedded within. We conducted a integrative systematic literature review to identify external context constructs likely to impact implementation of complex evidence-based interventions.

methodsThe review process was iterative due to our goal to inductively develop the identified constructs. Data collection occurred in four primary stages: (1) an initial set of key literature across disciplines was identified and used to inform (2) journal and (3) author searches that, in turn, informed the design of the final (4) database search. Additionally, (5) we conducted citation searches of relevant literature reviews identified in each stage. We carried out an inductive thematic content analysis with the goal of developing homogenous, well-defined, and mutually exclusive categories.

resultsWe identified eight external context constructs: (1) professional influences, (2) political support, (3) social climate, (4) local infrastructure, (5) policy and legal climate, (6) relational climate, (7) target population, and (8) funding and economic climate.

conclusionsThis is the first study to our knowledge to use a systematic review process to identify empirically observed external context factors documented to impact implementation. Comparison with four widely-utilized implementation frameworks supports the exhaustiveness of our review process. Future work should focus on the development of more stringent operationalization and measurement of these external constructs.

Indexed as

Empirical ResearchEvidence-Based PracticeHealth PromotionHumansExternal contextImplementation contextIntegrative reviewLocal contextOuter settingSystematic review

Identifiers

PMID29580251
PMCPMC5870506

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.