Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29580224›Full record

ArticleBMC genomics2018

Intraspecific comparative genomics of isolates of the Norway spruce pathogen (Heterobasidion parviporum) and identification of its potential virulence factors.

Zhen Zeng, Hui Sun, Eeva J Vainio, Tommaso Raffaello, Andriy Kovalchuk, Emmanuelle Morin, Sébastien Duplessis, Fred O Asiegbu

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC genomics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Early-Stage Infection-SpecificInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Article
  3. Genome sequence ofMicrobiology resource announcements · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Genomic and Secretomic Analyses of the Newly Isolated FungusApplied and environmental microbiology · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Phenotypic Recovery of aFrontiers in microbiology · 2021
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Genome-Wide Signatures of Selection inFrontiers in microbiology · 2019
    Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Zhen ZengDepartment of Forest Sciences, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.
Hui SunDepartment of Forest Sciences, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.
Eeva J VainioNatural Resources Institute Finland (Luke), Helsinki, Finland.
Tommaso RaffaelloDepartment of Forest Sciences, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.
Andriy KovalchukDepartment of Forest Sciences, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.
Emmanuelle MorinINRA UMR 1136 Interactions Arbres Micro-organismes, INRA Centre Grand Est Nancy, Champenoux, France.
Sébastien DuplessisINRA UMR 1136 Interactions Arbres Micro-organismes, INRA Centre Grand Est Nancy, Champenoux, France.
Fred O AsiegbuDepartment of Forest Sciences, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland. fred.asiegbu@helsinki.fi.

Funding

Academy of Finland 276862
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHeterobasidion parviporum is an economically most important fungal forest pathogen in northern Europe, causing root and butt rot disease of Norway spruce (Picea abies (L.) Karst.). The mechanisms underlying the pathogenesis and virulence of this species remain elusive. No reference genome to facilitate functional analysis is available for this species.

resultsTo better understand the virulence factor at both phenotypic and genomic level, we characterized 15 H. parviporum isolates originating from different locations across Finland for virulence, vegetative growth, sporulation and saprotrophic wood decay. Wood decay capability and latitude of fungal origins exerted interactive effects on their virulence and appeared important for H. parviporum virulence. We sequenced the most virulent isolate, the first full genome sequences of H. parviporum as a reference genome, and re-sequenced the remaining 14 H. parviporum isolates. Genome-wide alignments and intrinsic polymorphism analysis showed that these isolates exhibited overall high genomic similarity with an average of at least 96% nucleotide identity when compared to the reference, yet had remarkable intra-specific level of polymorphism with a bias for CpG to TpG mutations. Reads mapping coverage analysis enabled the classification of all predicted genes into five groups and uncovered two genomic regions exclusively present in the reference with putative contribution to its higher virulence. Genes enriched for copy number variations (deletions and duplications) and nucleotide polymorphism were involved in oxidation-reduction processes and encoding domains relevant to transcription factors. Some secreted protein coding genes based on the genome-wide selection pressure, or the presence of variants were proposed as potential virulence candidates.

conclusionOur study reported on the first reference genome sequence for this Norway spruce pathogen (H. parviporum). Comparative genomics analysis gave insight into the overall genomic variation among this fungal species and also facilitated the identification of several secreted protein coding genes as putative virulence factors for the further functional analysis. We also analyzed and identified phenotypic traits potentially linked to its virulence.

Indexed as

Genome, ViralBasidiomycotaGenomicsPiceaPlant DiseasesPolymorphism, Single NucleotideVirulence FactorsVirulence FactorsComparative genomicsCpG-biased mutationHeterobasidion parviporumOxidation-reduction processSaprotrophic wood decaySecreted proteinsTranscription factorsVirulence factors

Identifiers

PMID29580224
PMCPMC5870257

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.