Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29580189›Full record

ArticleJournal of occupational and environmental hygiene2018

Occupational exposure monitoring data collection, storage, and use among state-based and private workers' compensation insurers.

Taylor M Shockey, Kelsey R Babik, Steven J Wurzelbacher, Libby L Moore, Michael S Bisesi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of occupational and environmental hygiene, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Taylor M Shockeya Division of Surveillance, Hazard Evaluations, and Field Studies, National Institute for Occupational Health and Safety (NIOSH), Centers for Disease Control and Prevention , Cincinnati , Ohio.ORCID 0000-0002-7689-1933
Kelsey R Babika Division of Surveillance, Hazard Evaluations, and Field Studies, National Institute for Occupational Health and Safety (NIOSH), Centers for Disease Control and Prevention , Cincinnati , Ohio.
Steven J Wurzelbachera Division of Surveillance, Hazard Evaluations, and Field Studies, National Institute for Occupational Health and Safety (NIOSH), Centers for Disease Control and Prevention , Cincinnati , Ohio.
Libby L Moorea Division of Surveillance, Hazard Evaluations, and Field Studies, National Institute for Occupational Health and Safety (NIOSH), Centers for Disease Control and Prevention , Cincinnati , Ohio.
Michael S Bisesib Division of Environmental Health Sciences, College of Public Health, The Ohio State University , Columbus , Ohio.

Funding

Intramural CDC HHS CC999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite substantial financial and personnel resources being devoted to occupational exposure monitoring (OEM) by employers, workers' compensation insurers, and other organizations, the United States (U.S.) lacks comprehensive occupational exposure databases to use for research and surveillance activities. OEM data are necessary for determining the levels of workers' exposures; compliance with regulations; developing control measures; establishing worker exposure profiles; and improving preventive and responsive exposure surveillance and policy efforts. Workers' compensation insurers as a group may have particular potential for understanding exposures in various industries, especially among small employers. This is the first study to determine how selected state-based and private workers' compensation insurers collect, store, and use OEM data related specifically to air and noise sampling.  Of 50 insurers contacted to participate in this study, 28 completed an online survey. All of the responding private and the majority of state-based insurers offered industrial hygiene (IH) services to policyholders and employed 1 to 3 certified industrial hygienists on average. Many, but not all, insurers used standardized forms for data collection, but the data were not commonly stored in centralized databases. Data were most often used to provide recommendations for improvement to policyholders. Although not representative of all insurers, the survey was completed by insurers that cover a substantial number of employers and workers. The 20 participating state-based insurers on average provided 48% of the workers' compensation insurance benefits in their respective states or provinces. These results provide insight into potential next steps for improving the access to and usability of existing data as well as ways researchers can help organizations improve data collection strategies. This effort represents an opportunity for collaboration among insurers, researchers, and others that can help insurers and employers while advancing the exposure assessment field in the U.S.

Indexed as

Data CollectionHumansInsurance CarriersOccupational ExposureOccupational HealthUnited StatesWorkers' CompensationExposure assessmentexposure monitoringindustrial hygienepublic healthworkers' compensation

Identifiers

PMID29580189
PMCPMC8672207

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.