Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29580159›Full record

SynthesisHuman vaccines & immunotherapeutics2018

A systematic review and meta-analysis of the effects of educating parents on the benefits and schedules of childhood vaccinations in low and middle-income countries.

Lungeni Auguy Lukusa, Valantine Ngum Ndze, Nyanyiwe Masingi Mbeye, Charles Shey Wiysonge

Registry-linked trialAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04042246 (Knowledge on Vaccination Schedule and Full Immunization, and Its Effect on Vaccine Take-up in Jada Local Government Area in Adamawa State, Northeastern Nigeria), which is not on this map. Cited by 15 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04042246 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2019, after this paper: background citation

Knowledge on Vaccination Schedule and Full Immunization, and Its Effect on Vaccine Take-up in Jada Local Government Area in Adamawa State, Northeastern Nigeria

TypeinterventionalSponsorHarvard School of Public Health (HSPH)Ran2019 to 2020Enrolled400ConditionsImmunization, Infection, Educational Problems, Information Seeking BehaviorArmsInformation Provision
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Understanding vaccine acceptance and demand-and ways to increase them.Bundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz · 2020
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Lungeni Auguy Lukusaa Division of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Department of Global Health , Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Stellenbosch University , Cape Town , South Africa.
Valantine Ngum Ndzeb Department of Microbiology, Haematology, Parasitology and Infectious Disease , Faculty of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, University of Yaoundé I , Yaoundé , Cameroon.
Nyanyiwe Masingi Mbeyea Division of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Department of Global Health , Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Stellenbosch University , Cape Town , South Africa.ORCID 0000-0003-4733-7068
Charles Shey Wiysongea Division of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Department of Global Health , Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Stellenbosch University , Cape Town , South Africa.ORCID 0000-0002-1273-4779

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Public health benefits of childhood vaccinations risk being derailed by low vaccination coverage in low and middle-income countries. One reason for the low coverage is poor parental knowledge of the importance of completing vaccination schedules. We therefore assessed the effects on childhood vaccination coverage, of educating parents and other persons assuming the parental role. We prospectively registered the systematic review, published the protocol, and used standard Cochrane methods to collect and synthesise the evidence. We found six eligible randomised trials with 4248 participants. Three trials assessed health-facility based education of mothers on the importance of completing vaccination schedules; immediately after birth and three months later (one study) or during the first vaccination visit (two studies). The other trials assessed community-based education, including information campaigns on the importance of vaccines using audiotaped presentations and leaflet distributions (one study); structured group discussions on benefits and costs of childhood vaccination and local action plans for improving vaccine uptake (one study); and home-based information sessions using graphic cards showing benefits and costs of childhood vaccinations and location of vaccination centres (one study). Combining the data shows that these interventions lead to substantial improvements in childhood vaccination coverage (relative increase 36%, 95% confidence interval 14% to 62%). There was no difference between the effects of community-based and facility-based education. Therefore, education in communities and health facilities on the importance of childhood vaccinations should be integrated into all vaccination programmes in low and middle-income countries; accompanied by robust monitoring of impacts and use of data for action.

Indexed as

Developing CountriesChildCommunity ParticipationHealth EducationHumansImmunization ScheduleIncomeMass VaccinationParentsProgram EvaluationVaccination CoverageChildhood vaccinationdemand creationEducationlow and middle-income countriesparents

Identifiers

PMID29580159
PMCPMC6149946

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.