ArticleHuman vaccines & immunotherapeutics2018
Time interval of revaccination with 23-valent pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine more than 5 years does not affect the immunogenicity and safety in the Japanese elderly.
Article in Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Immunogenicity and safety study of 23-valent pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine revaccination among elderly individuals aged 60-70 years in Shanghai, China.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Trial
- Effectiveness of 23-Valent Pneumococcal Polysaccharide Vaccine against Invasive Pneumococcal Disease in Adults, Japan, 2013-2017.Emerging infectious diseases · 2020Article
- A Japanese nationwide survey of 23-valent pneumococcal capsular polysaccharide vaccine (PPSV23) revaccination coverage rate among elderly adults aged 65 and older and physician's attitude.Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2020Article
- Strategies for Geriatric Pneumonia in Healthcare Facilities - How Effective is Combined Influenza and Pneumococcal Vaccination?International journal of general medicine · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In the previous study, revaccination with 23-valent pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine (PPSV23) in a total of 161 elderly subjects (≥70 years of age) who had received the initial vaccination at least 5 years before (range: 5 to11 years) showed an acceptable safety profile and induction of immune responses to the serotypes in PPSV23. The optimal interval between the initial vaccination and revaccination with PPSV23 is of interest to protect elderly from pneumococcal disease over the long-term. In this post-hoc analysis, we analyzed that the immunogenicity and safety of revaccination with PPSV23 by time interval after the initial vaccination. The level of serotype-specific immunoglobulin G (IgG) geometric mean concentrations (GMCs) and opsonophagocytic killing activity (OPA) geometric mean titers (GMTs) at 4 weeks after revaccination with PPSV23 in each subgroup based on time interval (5, 6, 7, 8 and 9-11 years) after the initial vaccination were comparable to those after the primary vaccination and vaccine-induced serotype-specific IgG and OPA levels were similar regardless of the time interval after the initial vaccination. There was no difference in the safety profiles among the subgroups. In conclusion, administration of a second dose of PPSV23 at least 5 years after the initial vaccination was immunogenic and well-tolerated in the elderly ≥70 years of age regardless of the time interval after the initial vaccination.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.