Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29579574›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in genetics & development2018

Satellite DNA evolution: old ideas, new approaches.

Sarah Sander Lower, Michael P McGurk, Andrew G Clark, Daniel A Barbash

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in genetics & development, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 132 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
132citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
28.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

132 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 215 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Cross-species incompatibilities offer new insights into the functional consequences of satellite DNA evolution.Chromosome research : an international journal on the molecular, supramolecular and evolutionary aspects of chromosome biology · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Nuclear genome profiling of two species ofNAR genomics and bioinformatics · 2026
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Emergence of satellite DNAs suggests centromeric repositioning as a driver of karyotypic variation of the freshwater darter characines (Apareiodon affinis).Chromosome research : an international journal on the molecular, supramolecular and evolutionary aspects of chromosome biology · 2026
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Satellite DNA Genomics: The Ongoing Story.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  17. From minor loci to major players? Satellite DNA diversification in Crepis sensu stricto.Chromosome research : an international journal on the molecular, supramolecular and evolutionary aspects of chromosome biology · 2025
    Article
  18. Satellite DNA inPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

72 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Sarah Sander LowerDepartment of Molecular Biology and Genetics, Cornell University, 526 Campus Rd, Ithaca, NY 14853, United States.
Michael P McGurkDepartment of Molecular Biology and Genetics, Cornell University, 526 Campus Rd, Ithaca, NY 14853, United States.
Andrew G ClarkDepartment of Molecular Biology and Genetics, Cornell University, 526 Campus Rd, Ithaca, NY 14853, United States.
Daniel A BarbashDepartment of Molecular Biology and Genetics, Cornell University, 526 Campus Rd, Ithaca, NY 14853, United States. Electronic address: barbash@cornell.edu.
Cornell University · US

Funding

Heterochromatin and satellite repeat sequence variation in natural populationsR01GM119125 · NIGMS · CORNELL UNIVERSITY · PI BARBASH, DANIEL A, CLARK, ANDREW G · 2017 to 2020
$1.3M
Investigating the evolutionary dynamics and genetic determinants of satellite DNAF32GM126736 · NIGMS · CORNELL UNIVERSITY · PI LOWER, SARAH EMILY · 2017 to 2017
$43k
NIGMS NIH HHS F32 GM126736NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM119125
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A substantial portion of the genomes of most multicellular eukaryotes consists of large arrays of tandemly repeated sequence, collectively called satellite DNA. The processes generating and maintaining different satellite DNA abundances across lineages are important to understand as satellites have been linked to chromosome mis-segregation, disease phenotypes, and reproductive isolation between species. While much theory has been developed to describe satellite evolution, empirical tests of these models have fallen short because of the challenges in assessing satellite repeat regions of the genome. Advances in computational tools and sequencing technologies now enable identification and quantification of satellite sequences genome-wide. Here, we describe some of these tools and how their applications are furthering our knowledge of satellite evolution and function.

Indexed as

Evolution, MolecularAnimalsBase SequenceChromosome SegregationDNA, SatelliteEukaryotaGenomeReproductive IsolationDNA, Satellite

Identifiers

PMID29579574
PMCPMC5975084
OpenAlexW2790208381

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.