Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29579317›Full record

ArticleCancer2018

Capture of tobacco use among population-based registries: Findings from 10 National Program of Cancer Registries states.

David A Siegel, S Jane Henley, Jennifer M Wike, A Blythe Ryerson, Christopher J Johnson, Judy R Rees, Lori A Pollack, Enhancement of NPCR for Comparative Effectiveness Research Team

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Prevalence of Cigarette Smoking among Patients with Different Histologic Types of Kidney Cancer.Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2020
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Lung Cancer Among Women in the United States.Journal of women's health (2002) · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

David A SiegelEpidemic Intelligence Service, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia.ORCID 0000-0003-1394-0782
S Jane HenleyDivision of Cancer Prevention and Control, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia.ORCID 0000-0002-2420-306X
Jennifer M WikeDB Consulting Group, Inc, CDC-NPCR Contractor, Atlanta, Georgia.
A Blythe RyersonDivision of Cancer Prevention and Control, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia.
Christopher J JohnsonCancer Data Registry of Idaho, Boise, Idaho.
Judy R ReesNew Hampshire State Cancer Registry, Lebanon, New Hampshire.ORCID 0000-0002-8232-1056
Lori A PollackDivision of Cancer Prevention and Control, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia.
Enhancement of NPCR for Comparative Effectiveness Research Team

Funding

PROJECT CONSISTS OF THE NAT'L COMPREHENSIVE CANCER CONTROL PROG, NAT'L PROG FOR CU58DP000792 · DP · ALASKA STATE DEPARTMENT OF HLTH-SOC SVCS · PI ALLELY, KATHY · 2007 to 2011
$15.8M
Intramural CDC HHS CC999999NCCDPHP CDC HHS U58 DP000792
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTobacco use data are important when the epidemiology and prognosis of tobacco-associated cancers are being defined. Central cancer registries in 10 National Program of Cancer Registries states pilot-tested the collection of standardized tobacco use variables. This study evaluated the capture of tobacco use data and examined smoking prevalence among cancer patients.

methodsParticipating registries collected data about the use of tobacco-cigarettes, other smoked tobacco, and smokeless tobacco-for cases diagnosed during 2011-2013. The percentage of cases with known tobacco variable values was calculated, and the prevalence of tobacco use was analyzed by the primary cancer site and state.

resultsAmong 1,646,505 incident cancer cases, 51% had known cigarette use data: 18% were current users, 31% were former users, and 51% reported never using. The percentage of cases with a known status for both other smoked tobacco and smokeless tobacco was 43%, with 97% and 98% coded as never users, respectively. The percent known for cigarette use ranged from 27% to 81% by state and improved from 47% in 2011 to 59% in 2013 for all 10 states combined. The percent known for cigarette use and the prevalence of ever smoking cigarettes were highest for laryngeal cancer and tracheal, lung, and bronchus cancer.

conclusionsCancer registrars ascertained cigarette use for slightly more than half of all new cancer cases, but other tobacco-related fields were less complete. Studies to evaluate the validity of specific tobacco-related variables and the ability of cancer registries to capture this information from the medical record are needed to gauge the usefulness of collecting these variables through cancer surveillance systems. Cancer 2018;124:2381-9. © 2018 American Cancer Society.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasmsPrevalenceRegistriesTobacco ProductsTobacco UseUnited Statescancerepidemiologyregistriessmokingsurveillancetobacco

Identifiers

PMID29579317
PMCPMC6277975

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.