Observational studyHuman reproduction (Oxford, England)2018
Reduced fecundity in HIV-positive women.
Observational study in Human reproduction (Oxford, England), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Perceptions About the Relationship Between HIV, Antiretroviral Therapy (ART), and Fecundity in Sub-Saharan Africa: Findings from a Systematic Scoping Review.AIDS and behavior · 2026Article
- The Relationship Between Contraceptive Method Use and Return of Fecundity Among Women Attempting Pregnancy in Low- and Middle-Income Countries.Demography · 2023Article
- Article
- Perceived Infertility Among Young Adults in Balaka, Malawi.International perspectives on sexual and reproductive health · 2020Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
study questionIs HIV associated with increased time to pregnancy (TTP)? SUMMARY ANSWER: HIV-positive women who discontinue a contraceptive method to become pregnant have increased TTP, particularly among those who likely do not know their status. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: HIV-positive women have fewer children on average than their HIV-negative counterparts due to both behavioral and biological factors. There is a need to better describe and quantify fecundity patterns associated with HIV in the general population. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: This cross-sectional study was based on data from 12 Demographic and Health Surveys (DHSs) conducted between 2003 and 2013 in 11 African countries. All studies collected dried blood spot samples for HIV testing and included a retrospective calendar module that recorded women's monthly reproductive status in the 5 years preceding the survey. TTP was measured among 3181 women discontinuing a contraceptive method within 2 years of the survey in order to become pregnant. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING,
methodsWe use Cox proportional hazard models for discrete survival data to model TTP and estimate fecundability odds ratios (FOR) and 95% CIs for the 12-month period following contraceptive discontinuation. In addition to employing a binary measure of HIV status, we also develop an additional explanatory measure that combines HIV status with information on whether respondents had ever been tested for HIV and received their results (which proxies for knowledge of HIV status) to reduce the threat of confounding from behavioral changes following an HIV diagnosis. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: In our sample, 10.3% of women were HIV-positive, and a little more than half (51.8%) of women received test results and likely knew their status. Over a 12-month observation period, HIV-positive women had a 25% average reduction in fecundity compared to HIV-negative women [adjusted FOR (aFOR) = 0.75 (0.62-0.92)] after adjusting for confounders. The 12-month fecundity patterns differed by women's likely knowledge of their status such that results were primarily driven by HIV-positive women who likely did not know their status. Moreover, reductions in fecundity attributable to HIV were not uniform over time. Among women who were still trying for pregnancy after 3 unsuccessful months, HIV-positive women had half the odds of becoming pregnant compared to HIV-negative women [aFOR = 0.50 (0.35-0.71)]. Conversely, there were no significant differences in FORs between HIV-negative and HIV-positive women in the first 3 months. LIMITATIONS REASONS FOR CAUTION: Because dried blood spot samples for HIV testing were collected at the time of the survey but reproductive calendar data were collected retrospectively, it is possible that we introduced misclassification bias, as we have no knowledge if the acquisition of HIV occurred before or after pregnancy attempt. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE
findingsAs life expectancy and quality health status improve due to earlier initiation of antiretroviral (ARV) treatment in HIV-positive women, there has been growing awareness that services should also address the fertility desires of HIV-positive women who want children. These findings indicate that if a pregnancy does not occur after 3 months of attempting pregnancy, HIV-positive women and HIV-discordant couples should request access to HIV and reproductive pre-pregnancy counseling and health assessments. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S): A.G. was supported by the National Institutes of Health (contract T32-HD007275) during the study. During the conceptualization, data collection and analysis time frame, S.vdP. was supported by WHO/RHR/HRP Special Program in Reproductive Health and Research, Geneva, Switzerland, and HRP (the UNDP/UNFPA/UNICEF/WHO/World Bank Special Programme of Research, Development and Research Training in Human Reproduction). The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.