Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29579095›Full record

ArticlePLoS genetics2018

DNA strand-exchange patterns associated with double-strand break-induced and spontaneous mitotic crossovers in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Yee Fang Hum, Sue Jinks-Robertson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS genetics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Mitotic recombination in yeast: what we know and what we don't know.Current opinion in genetics & development · 2021
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Genome-wide mapping of spontaneous genetic alterations in diploid yeast cells.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2020
    Article
  6. Article
  7. POLQ suppresses interhomolog recombination and loss of heterozygosity at targeted DNA breaks.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2020
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Yee Fang HumDepartment of Molecular Genetics and Microbiology and the University Program in Genetics and Genomics, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-1666-332X
Sue Jinks-RobertsonDepartment of Molecular Genetics and Microbiology and the University Program in Genetics and Genomics, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-5924-5852

Funding

Regulation of mitotic genome stability in yeast.R35GM118077 · NIGMS · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI JINKS-ROBERTSON, SUE · 2016 to 2023
$4.5M
REGULATION OF MITOTIC RECOMBINATION IN YEASTR01GM038464 · NIGMS · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI JINKS-ROBERTSON, SUE · 1992 to 2015
$3.6M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM038464NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM118077NIH HHS R01 GM038464NIH HHS R35 GM118077
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mitotic recombination can result in loss of heterozygosity and chromosomal rearrangements that shape genome structure and initiate human disease. Engineered double-strand breaks (DSBs) are a potent initiator of recombination, but whether spontaneous events initiate with the breakage of one or both DNA strands remains unclear. In the current study, a crossover (CO)-specific assay was used to compare heteroduplex DNA (hetDNA) profiles, which reflect strand exchange intermediates, associated with DSB-induced versus spontaneous events in yeast. Most DSB-induced CO products had the two-sided hetDNA predicted by the canonical DSB repair model, with a switch in hetDNA position from one product to the other at the position of the break. Approximately 40% of COs, however, had hetDNA on only one side of the initiating break. This anomaly can be explained by a modified model in which there is frequent processing of an early invasion (D-loop) intermediate prior to extension of the invading end. Finally, hetDNA tracts exhibited complexities consistent with frequent expansion of the DSB into a gap, migration of strand-exchange junctions, and template switching during gap-filling reactions. hetDNA patterns in spontaneous COs isolated in either a wild-type background or in a background with elevated levels of reactive oxygen species (tsa1Δ mutant) were similar to those associated with the DSB-induced events, suggesting that DSBs are the major instigator of spontaneous mitotic recombination in yeast.

Indexed as

Crossing Over, GeneticDNA Breaks, Double-StrandedChromosomes, FungalDNA, FungalMitosisNucleic Acid HeteroduplexesSaccharomyces cerevisiaeDNA, FungalNucleic Acid Heteroduplexes

Identifiers

PMID29579095
PMCPMC5886692

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.