Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29579083›Full record

ArticlePloS one2018

Obesity and emergency care in the French CONSTANCES cohort.

Anne-Laure Feral-Pierssens, Claire Carette, Claire Rives-Lange, Joane Matta, Marcel Goldberg, Philippe Juvin, Marie Zins, Sebastien Czernichow

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Anne-Laure Feral-PierssensPopulation-based Epidemiological Cohorts Unit, INSERM UMS 11, Villejuif, France.ORCID 0000-0003-0461-5611
Claire CaretteAssistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris, Nutrition Department, Georges Pompidou european Hospital, Centre Spécialisé Obésité IdF, Paris, France.
Claire Rives-LangeAssistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris, Nutrition Department, Georges Pompidou european Hospital, Centre Spécialisé Obésité IdF, Paris, France.
Joane MattaNutrition Department, Faculty of Agricultural and Food Sciences, Holy Spirit University, Jounieh, Lebanon.
Marcel GoldbergPopulation-based Epidemiological Cohorts Unit, INSERM UMS 11, Villejuif, France.
Philippe JuvinAssistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris, Emergency Department, Georges Pompidou european Hospital, Paris, France.
Marie ZinsPopulation-based Epidemiological Cohorts Unit, INSERM UMS 11, Villejuif, France.
Sebastien CzernichowAssistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris, Nutrition Department, Georges Pompidou european Hospital, Centre Spécialisé Obésité IdF, Paris, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

contextObese patients are raising specific questions in emergency care such as equipment issues or urgent procedures. Even though obesity prevalence and subsequent health expenditure are increasing worldwide, there is scarce literature about their specific resource utilization of Emergency Departments (ED). These few studies do not take into account both socio-economic situation and comorbidities which are well-known factors influencing healthcare use. Our objective was to assess the emergency care resource utilization of obese individuals (Body Mass Index (BMI) ≥ 30kg.m-2) compared to normal-weight individuals taking into account comorbidities and social-economic situations.

methodsThe French CONSTANCES epidemiologic cohort is a randomly selected sample of French adults. Participants data are linked to the National Health Insurance Database collecting all medical acts. The rate of ED visits of obese (and each obesity class) and normal-weight participants were compared considering confounding factors (comorbidities, various socio-economic data). The primary endpoint was to have visited the ED between 2010 and 2013. Sex-separated analysis and multivariate logistic regression models were performed and adjusted odds-ratios [OR] (95% Confidence Intervals [CI]) were calculated.

resultsWe included 21,035 normal-weight and 5,003 obese participants. Obese participants visited the ED more often than normal-weight participants (men: 30.5% vs. 26.7%; women: 30.3% vs. 24.4%, P<0.001). Obese participants presented more comorbidities and a lower socio-economic situation than normal-weight participants. After adjustment, obese participants had a higher risk of visiting ED (men: OR = 1.18; 95% CI: 1.04-1.33; and women: OR = 1.36; 95% CI: 1.22-1.52), with a higher risk for class III participants (BMI ≥ 40 kg.m-2) (men: OR = 2.18; CI 95%: 1.32-3.63; and women: OR = 1.85; 95% CI: 1.38-2.49).

conclusionObese individuals have a higher level of emergency care resource utilization than normal-weight individuals and it increases with severe obesity. Further studies are needed to better understand their healthcare pathways leading to EDs.

Indexed as

Emergency Medical ServicesAdolescentAdultAgedBody Mass IndexCardiovascular DiseasesCohort StudiesDatabases, FactualFemaleFranceHumansLogistic ModelsMaleMiddle AgedObesityOdds Ratio

Identifiers

PMID29579083
PMCPMC5868832

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.