Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29579058›Full record

ArticlePloS one2018

Comparative oncology approach to drug repurposing in osteosarcoma.

Alejandro Parrales, Peter McDonald, Megan Ottomeyer, Anuradha Roy, Frank J Shoenen, Melinda Broward, Tyce Bruns, Douglas H Thamm, Scott J Weir, Kathleen A Neville and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Repurposing Drugs in Small Animal Oncology.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2022
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Alejandro ParralesDepartment of Cancer Biology, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas, United States of America.
Peter McDonaldHigh Throughput Screening Laboratory, University of Kansas Cancer Center, University of Kansas, Lawrence, Kansas, United States of America.
Megan OttomeyerDepartment of Cancer Biology, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas, United States of America.
Anuradha RoyHigh Throughput Screening Laboratory, University of Kansas Cancer Center, University of Kansas, Lawrence, Kansas, United States of America.
Frank J ShoenenUniversity of Kansas Cancer Center, Kansas City, Kansas, United States of America.
Melinda BrowardUniversity of Kansas Cancer Center, Kansas City, Kansas, United States of America.
Tyce BrunsInstitute for Advancing Medical Innovation, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas, United States of America.
Douglas H ThammFlint Animal Cancer Center, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado, United States of America.
Scott J WeirUniversity of Kansas Cancer Center, Kansas City, Kansas, United States of America.
Kathleen A NevilleArkansas Children's Hospital, Little Rock, Arkansas, United States of America.
Tomoo IwakumaDepartment of Cancer Biology, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas, United States of America.
Joy M FulbrightUniversity of Kansas Cancer Center, Kansas City, Kansas, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-9245-1359
The University of Kansas Cancer Center · USChildren's Mercy Hospital · USUniversity of Kansas · USArkansas Children's Hospital · USUniversity of Colorado Cancer Center · USUniversity of Kansas Medical Center · US

Funding

Transgenic & Gene-Targeting Shared ResourceP30CA168524 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS MEDICAL CENTER · PI ROY A. JENSEN · 2012 to 2026
$40.1M
Synthetic Chemical Biology CoreP20GM113117 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS LAWRENCE · PI OROZCO, ROBIN C. · 2016 to 2025
$23.9M
The role of MDM2-MTBP axis in cancer metastasisR01CA174735 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS MEDICAL CENTER · PI IWAKUMA, TOMOO · 2014 to 2018
$1.6M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA168524NCI NIH HHS R01 CA174735NIGMS NIH HHS P20 GM113117NIH HHS CA174735NIH HHS P30 CA168524
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOsteosarcoma is an orphan disease for which little improvement in survival has been made since the late 1980s. New drug discovery for orphan diseases is limited by the cost and time it takes to develop new drugs. Repurposing already approved FDA-drugs can help overcome this limitation. Another limitation of cancer drug discovery is the lack of preclinical models that accurately recapitulate what occurs in humans. For OS using dogs as a model can minimize this limitation as OS in canines develops spontaneously, is locally invasive and metastasizes to the lungs as it does in humans.

methodsIn our present work we used high-throughput screens to identify drugs from a library of 2,286 FDA-approved drugs that demonstrated selective growth inhibition against both human and canine OS cell lines. The identified lead compound was then tested for synergy with 7 other drugs that have demonstrated activity against OS. These results were confirmed with in vitro assays and an in vivo murine model of OS.

resultsWe identified 13 drugs that demonstrated selective growth inhibition against both human and canine OS cell lines. Auranofin was selected for further in vitro combination drug screens. Auranofin showed synergistic effects with vorinostat and rapamycin on OS viability and apoptosis induction. Auranofin demonstrated single-agent growth inhibition in both human and canine OS xenografts, and cooperative growth inhibition was observed in combination with rapamycin or vorinostat. There was a significant decrease in Ki67-positive cells and an increase in cleaved caspase-3 levels in tumor tissues treated with a combination of auranofin and vorinostat or rapamycin.

conclusionsAuranofin, alone or in combination with rapamycin or vorinostat, may be useful new treatment strategies for OS. Future studies may evaluate the efficacy of auranofin in dogs with OS as a prelude to human clinical evaluation.

Indexed as

Drug RepositioningAnimalsAntineoplastic AgentsApoptosisBone NeoplasmsCell Line, TumorCell ProliferationCell SurvivalDisease Models, AnimalDogsDose-Response Relationship, DrugDrug Screening Assays, AntitumorDrug SynergismHigh-Throughput Screening AssaysHumansMiceAntineoplastic AgentsSmall Molecule Libraries

Identifiers

PMID29579058
PMCPMC5868798
OpenAlexW2792052811

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.