Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29579039›Full record

ArticlePloS one2018

AMYCNE: Confident copy number assessment using whole genome sequencing data.

Jesper Eisfeldt, Daniel Nilsson, Johanna C Andersson-Assarsson, Anna Lindstrand

Abstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. High-coverage ancient genomes reveal divergent population histories and prehistoric starch-related genetic variation in Japan.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jesper EisfeldtDepartment of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, and Center for Molecular Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0003-3716-4917
Daniel NilssonDepartment of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, and Center for Molecular Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Johanna C Andersson-AssarssonDepartment of Molecular and Clinical Medicine, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Anna LindstrandDepartment of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, and Center for Molecular Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Copy number variations (CNVs) within the human genome have been linked to a diversity of inherited diseases and phenotypic traits. The currently used methodology to measure copy numbers has limited resolution and/or precision, especially for regions with more than 4 copies. Whole genome sequencing (WGS) offers an alternative data source to allow for the detection and characterization of the copy number across different genomic regions in a single experiment. A plethora of tools have been developed to utilize WGS data for CNV detection. None of these tools are designed specifically to accurately estimate copy numbers of complex regions in a small cohort or clinical setting. Herein, we present AMYCNE (automatic modeling functionality for copy number estimation), a CNV analysis tool using WGS data. AMYCNE is multifunctional and performs copy number estimation of complex regions, annotation of VCF files, and CNV detection on individual samples. The performance of AMYCNE was evaluated using AMY1A ddPCR measurements from 86 unrelated individuals. In addition, we validated the accuracy of AMYCNE copy number predictions on two additional genes (FCGR3A and FCGR3B) using datasets available through the 1000 genomes consortium. Finally, we simulated levels of mosaic loss and gain of chromosome X and used this dataset for benchmarking AMYCNE. The results show a high concordance between AMYCNE and ddPCR, validating the use of AMYCNE to measure tandem AMY1 repeats with high accuracy. This opens up new possibilities for the use of WGS for accurate copy number determination of other complex regions in the genome in small cohorts or single individuals.

Indexed as

DNA Copy Number VariationsChromosomes, Human, XGenetic LociGPI-Linked ProteinsHumansPattern Recognition, AutomatedReceptors, IgGSalivary alpha-AmylasesWhole Genome SequencingAMY1A protein, humanFCGR3A protein, humanFCGR3B protein, humanGPI-Linked ProteinsReceptors, IgGSalivary alpha-Amylases

Identifiers

PMID29579039
PMCPMC5868770

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.