Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29578955›Full record

ArticleMedical care2018

Oregon Medicaid Expenditures After the 2014 Affordable Care Act Medicaid Expansion: Over-time Differences Among New, Returning, and Continuously Insured Enrollees.

Rachel Springer, Miguel Marino, Jean P O'Malley, Stephan Lindner, Nathalie Huguet, Jennifer E DeVoe

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical care, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02657499 (Post Affordable Care Act), which is not on this map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02657499 completednot on this map

Post Affordable Care Act: Evaluation of Community Health Centers

TypeobservationalSponsorOregon Health and Science UniversityRan2012 to 2018Enrolled1,939,848ConditionsChronic DiseaseArmsMedicaid Expansion
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Rachel SpringerDepartment of Family Medicine, Oregon Health and Science University.
Miguel MarinoDepartment of Family Medicine, Oregon Health and Science University.
Jean P O'MalleyDepartment of Family Medicine, Oregon Health and Science University.
Stephan LindnerCenter for Health Systems Effectiveness, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR.
Nathalie HuguetDepartment of Family Medicine, Oregon Health and Science University.
Jennifer E DeVoeDepartment of Family Medicine, Oregon Health and Science University.

Funding

Community-based HIT Tools for Cancer Screening and Health Insurance PromotionR01CA181452 · NCI · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI DEVOE, JENNIFER E · 2014 to 2018
$3.1M
PREVENT-D: Post ACA Reform: Evaluate Community Health Center Care for DiabetesU18DP006116 · DP · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI HUGUET, NATHALIE · 2015 to 2019
$2.2M
ACCESS: Assessing Community Cancer care after insurance ExpanSionSR01CA204267 · NCI · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI DEVOE, JENNIFER E · 2016 to 2020
$2.0M
Post Affordable Care Act: Evaluation of Community Health Centers (PACE)R01HS024270 · AHRQ · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI DEVOE, JENNIFER E · 2015 to 2016
$796k
ACL HHS U18DP006116AHRQ HHS R01 HS024270NCCDPHP CDC HHS U18 DP006116NCI NIH HHS R01 CA181452NCI NIH HHS R01 CA204267
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThere is interest in assessing health care utilization and expenditures among new Medicaid enrollees after the 2014 Medicaid expansion. Recent studies have not differentiated between newly enrolled individuals and those returning after coverage gaps.

objectivesTo assess health care expenditures among Medicaid enrollees in the 24 months after Oregon's 2014 Medicaid expansions and examine whether expenditure patterns were different among the newly, returning, and continuously insured (CI). RESEARCH

designRetrospective cohort study using inverse-propensity weights to adjust for differences between groups. SUBJECTS: Oregon adult Medicaid beneficiaries insured continuously from 2014 to 2015 who were either newly, returning, or CI. MEASURES: Monthly expenditures for inpatient care, prescription drugs, total outpatient care, and subdivisions of outpatient care: emergency department, dental, mental and behavioral health, primary care, and specialist care.

resultsAfter initial increases, newly and returning insured (RI) outpatient expenditures dropped below CI. Expenditures for emergency department and dental services among the RI remained higher than among the newly insured. Newly insured mental and behavioral health, primary care, and specialist expenditures plateaued higher than RI. Prescription drug expenditures increased over time for all groups, with CI highest and RI lowest. All groups had similar inpatient expenditures over 24 months post-Medicaid expansion.

conclusionsOur findings reveal that outpatient expenditures for new nonpregnant, non-dual-eligible Oregon Medicaid recipients stabilized over time after meeting pent-up demand, and prior insurance history affected the mix of services that individuals received. Policy evaluations should consider expenditures over at least 24 months and should account for enrollees' prior insurance histories.

Indexed as

Ambulatory CareCohort StudiesFemaleHealth ExpendituresHealth Services AccessibilityHumansInsurance CoverageInsurance, HealthMaleMedicaidOregonPatient Protection and Affordable Care ActRetrospective StudiesUnited States

Identifiers

PMID29578955
PMCPMC5893375

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.