Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29578850›Full record

ArticleJournal of managed care & specialty pharmacy2018

Assessing Quality of Care in Pharmacy: Remembering Donabedian.

Michael T Rupp

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of managed care & specialty pharmacy, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. To Reform Pharmacy Reimbursement Begin with the Basics.Journal of managed care & specialty pharmacy · 2020
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Assessing the Quality of Pharmacy Care: It's Not About Adherence.Journal of managed care & specialty pharmacy · 2019
    Article
  11. Can Leadership Enhance Patient Satisfaction? Assessing the Role of Administrative and Medical Quality.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Michael T Rupp1 Midwestern University College of Pharmacy, Glendale, Arizona.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

While some incremental and fragmented progress has been made in recent years, assessing the quality of care provided by pharmacists and pharmacy organizations remains an elusive goal. Revisiting the simple, elegant model of quality assessment originally proposed by physician and scholar Avedis Donabedian can assist pharmacy quality managers to develop a more comprehensive approach to measuring, monitoring, and managing the quality of care. DISCLOSURES: No funding supported the writing of this article. The author has no relevant conflicts of interest to disclose.

Indexed as

Quality of Health CareOutcome and Process Assessment, Health CarePharmaceutical ServicesPharmacies

Identifiers

PMID29578850
PMCPMC10398019

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.