Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29578597›Full record

ArticleCancer2018

Perspectives of Chinese American smoker and nonsmoker household pairs about the creating smokefree living together program.

Anne Saw, Debora A Paterniti, Lei-Chun Fung, Janice Y Tsoh, Elisa K Tong

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 42% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Anne SawDepartment of Psychology, DePaul University, Chicago, Illinois.ORCID 0000-0002-3214-0345
Debora A PaternitiCenter for Healthcare Policy and Research, Davis Medical Center, University of California, Sacramento, California.
Lei-Chun FungChinatown Public Health Center, San Francisco Department of Public Health, San Francisco, California.
Janice Y TsohDepartment of Psychiatry, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California.
Elisa K TongDepartment of Internal Medicine, Davis Medical Center, University of California, Sacramento, California.
DePaul University · USSan Francisco Department of Public Health · USSonoma State University · USUniversity of California Davis Medical Center · USUniversity of California, San Francisco · US

Funding

Research ProjectU54CA153499 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT DAVIS · PI CHEN, MOON SHAO-CHUANG, CHOW, EDWARD A. · 2010 to 2015
$6.7M
Sinag Tala (Bright Star): Pilipina Breast Cancer Support Group OutreachU01CA114640 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA DAVIS · PI CHEN, MOON SHAO-CHUANG · 2005 to 2010
$6.5M
NCI NIH HHS U01 CA114640NCI NIH HHS U54 CA153499NIDA NIH HHS L30 DA034563
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundChinese men smoke at high rates, and this puts household members at risk for tobacco-related diseases. Culturally responsive interventions that provide education and support are needed to promote smokefree living and reduce smoke exposure, particularly for US immigrants who experience changes in smokefree social norms. This qualitative study examines perspectives of Chinese American smoker and nonsmoker household pairs in the Creating Smokefree Living Together program.

methodsFour focus groups were conducted with 30 Chinese American participants (15 smokers and 15 nonsmokers) who, in household pairs, completed smokefree education interventions of either brief or moderate intensity. Nearly three-quarters of the smokers continued to smoke after the intervention at the time of focus group participation. All smokers were male, and most household nonsmokers were female spouses. All participants had limited English proficiency. Focus group meetings were recorded, and the recordings were translated and transcribed. Transcripts and field notes were thematically analyzed.

resultsThe following themes, shared by smokers and nonsmokers across interventions, were identified: 1) there was a preference for dyadic and group interventions because of the support offered, 2) increased knowledge of the health harms of smoke exposure within a pair improved the nonsmoker's support for smokefree living, 3) learning communication strategies improved household relationships and assertiveness for smokefree environments, 4) biochemical feedback was useful but had short-term effects, and 5) project magnets provided cues to action.

conclusionsInvolving household partners is critical to smokefree interventions. Simple reminders at home appear to be more powerful than personal biochemical feedback of smoke exposure for sustaining motivation and engagement in ongoing behavioral changes within the household. Cancer 2018;124:1599-606. © 2018 American Cancer Society.

Indexed as

Health BehaviorHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAsianEarly Intervention, EducationalFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleMiddle AgedNon-SmokersPrognosisSan FranciscoSmokersChinesehouseholdinterventionsecondhand smoketobacco use

Identifiers

PMID29578597
PMCPMC5873596
OpenAlexW2796355709

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.