Observational studyJournal of hospital medicine2018
Focusing on Inattention: The Diagnostic Accuracy of Brief Measures of Inattention for Detecting Delirium.
Observational study in Journal of hospital medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- GRADE-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines for Emergency Department Delirium Risk Stratification, Screening, and Brain Imaging in Older Patients With Suspected Delirium.Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine · 2026Guideline
- Delirium detection in the emergency department: A diagnostic accuracy meta-analysis of history, physical examination, laboratory tests, and screening instruments.Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine · 2024Pooled it
- Screening instruments for cognitive impairment in older patients in the Emergency Department: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Age and ageing · 2021Pooled it
- Delirium detection methodologies: Implications for outcome measurement in clinical trials in postoperative delirium.International journal of geriatric psychiatry · 2022Trial
- Delirium in older adults in the emergency department: a scoping review of current research and identified knowledge gaps.BMC emergency medicine · 2026Article
- Electrical stimulation of the vagus nerve improves amyloid pathology in delirium superimposed on dementia.Bioelectronic medicine · 2026Article
- Delirium and Delirium Prevention in the Emergency Department.Clinics in geriatric medicine · 2023Review
- Detecting delirium: a systematic review of ultrabrief identification instruments for hospital patients.Frontiers in psychology · 2023Review
- Deconstructing delirium in the post anaesthesia care unit.Frontiers in aging neuroscience · 2022Article
- Treating Pediatric and Geriatric Patients at Risk of Suicide in General Emergency Departments: Perspectives From Emergency Department Clinical Leaders.Annals of emergency medicine · 2021Article
- Delirium Prevention, Detection, and Treatment in Emergency Medicine Settings: A Geriatric Emergency Care Applied Research (GEAR) Network Scoping Review and Consensus Statement.Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine · 2021Article
- Succinct Approach to Delirium in the Emergency Department.Current emergency and hospital medicine reports · 2021Review
- Delirium: A Marker of Vulnerability in Older People.Frontiers in aging neuroscience · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundDelirium is frequently missed in most clinical settings. Brief delirium assessments are needed.
objectiveTo determine the diagnostic accuracy of reciting the months of year backwards (MOTYB) from December to July (MOTYB-6) and December to January (MOTYB-12) for delirium as diagnosed by a psychiatrist and to explore the diagnostic accuracies of the following other brief attention tasks: (1) spell the word "LUNCH" backwards, (2) recite the days of the week backwards, (3) 10-letter vigilance "A" task, and (4) 5 picture recognition task.
designPreplanned secondary analysis of a prospective observational study.
settingEmergency department located within an academic, tertiary care hospital.
participants234 acutely ill patients who were =65 years old. MEASUREMENTS: The inattention tasks were administered by a physician. The reference standard for delirium was a comprehensive psychiatrist assessment using Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition, Text Revision criteria. Sensitivities and specificities were calculated.
resultsMaking any error on the MOTYB-6 task had a sensitivity of 80.0% (95% confidence interval [CI], 60.9%-91.1%) and specificity of 57.1% (95% CI, 50.4%- 63.7%). Making any error on the MOTYB-12 task had a sensitivity of 84.0% (95% CI, 65.4%-93.6%) and specificity of 51.9% (95% CI, 45.2%-58.5%). The best combination of sensitivity and specificity was reciting the days of the week backwards task; if the patient made any error, this was 84.0% (95% CI, 65.4%-93.6%) sensitive and 81.9% (95% CI, 76.1%-86.5%) specific.
conclusionsMOTYB-6 and MOTYB-12 had very good sensitivities but had modest specificities for delirium, limiting their use as a standalone assessment. Reciting the days of the week backwards appeared to have the best combination of sensitivity and specificity for delirium.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.