Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29578098›Full record

ArticlePapillomavirus research (Amsterdam, Netherlands)2018

Influencers and preference predictors of HPV vaccine uptake among US male and female young adult college students.

A Scott LaJoie, Jelani C Kerr, Richard D Clover, Diane M Harper

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Papillomavirus research (Amsterdam, Netherlands), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 45 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Evolutionarily Optimal Risk Aversion.Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Primary Care Providers' Perspectives on Barriers and Facilitators to Human Papillomavirus (HPV) Vaccination among Young Adults: A Qualitative Study.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Mind the Gap: Sex-Specific Drivers of Human Papillomavirus Vaccination Uptake in Serbian University Students.European journal of investigation in health, psychology and education · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. College Students' Digital Media Preferences for future HPV Vaccine Campaigns.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2022
    Article
  18. Observational
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

A Scott LaJoieUniversity of Louisville, School of Public Health and Information Sciences, Department of Health Promotion & Behavioral Sciences, 485 East Gray Street, Louisville, KY 40202, United States. Electronic address: lajoie@louisville.edu.
Jelani C KerrUniversity of Louisville, School of Public Health and Information Sciences, Department of Health Promotion & Behavioral Sciences, 485 East Gray Street, Louisville, KY 40202, United States. Electronic address: j.kerr@louisville.edu.
Richard D CloverUniversity of Louisville, School of Public Health and Information Sciences, Department of Health Promotion & Behavioral Sciences, 485 East Gray Street, Louisville, KY 40202, United States.
Diane M HarperUniversity of Michigan, School of Medicine, Department of Family Medicine, 1018 Fuller Street, Ann Arbor, MI 48105, United States. Electronic address: diane.m.harper@gmail.com.
University of Louisville · USUniversity of Michigan–Ann Arbor · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe purpose of the study was to assess the knowledge, attitudes and beliefs of male and female college students in Kentucky about HPV associated diseases and vaccines, and to determine which parameters predicted self-reported uptake of HPV vaccination. MATERIALS AND

methodsA self-selected cross-sectional sample of college students completed an evidence-based online survey.

resultsOf approximately 1200 potential respondents, 585 completed the survey. The average age was 20.6 (SD 3.15) and 78% were female; 84% of the population had had one or more sexual partners. Concern for HPV vaccine safety and potential need for boosters did not significantly deter vaccine uptake. Likewise, knowledge about HPV associated cancers was not predictive of vaccine uptake. On the other hand, parental influence for vaccination was a strong predictor for vaccine uptake (aOR = 5.32, 2.71-13.03), and free vaccine nearly doubled the likelihood of being vaccinated (aOR 1.90, 1.05-3.41). In addition, the strong preference for the respondent's partner to be HPV vaccinated predicted vaccine uptake (aOR = 4.04, 95% CI: 2.31-7.05), but the lack of preference for partner vaccination predicted an unvaccinated self (aOR = 0.50, 0.27-0.93).

conclusionsHPV vaccination has been successful in young adult college students in Kentucky. Young adults prefer their partners to be HPV vaccinated regardless of whether they themselves are vaccinated. Parental influence and free vaccine were positive predictors for vaccine uptake in this population.

Indexed as

Health Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeUniversitiesAdultCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMalePapillomavirus InfectionsPapillomavirus VaccinesParentsPatient Acceptance of Health CarePeer InfluenceSexual PartnersStudentsSurveys and QuestionnairesVaccinationPapillomavirus VaccinesHPV vaccineKnowledgePreferencesSafetyYoung adults

Identifiers

PMID29578098
PMCPMC5886909
OpenAlexW2794002675

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.