Observational studyClinical cardiology2018
Rationale and design of the FELICITAR registry (Frailty Evaluation After List Inclusion, Characteristics and Influence on Transplantation and Results).
Observational study in Clinical cardiology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- The incremental predictive value of frailty measures in elderly patients undergoing cardiac surgery: A systematic review.Clinical cardiology · 2018Pooled it
- Comparison of feasibility and results of frailty assessment methods prior to left ventricular assist device implantation.ESC heart failure · 2022Article
- Rationale and design of the FELICITAR registry (Frailty Evaluation After List Inclusion, Characteristics and Influence on Transplantation and Results).Clinical cardiology · 2018Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Frailty reflects a state of decreased physiological reserve and vulnerability to stressors. Its prevalence among patients with cardiovascular disease is as high as 60%. Frailty is associated with a poor prognosis for patients with heart failure, increasingly frequent hospitalization, and death. The recent published listing criteria for heart transplantation of the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation recommend assessing frailty (class IIb recommendation, level of evidence C). However, this recommendation is not based on prospective studies, and frailty scores have only been validated in patients age > 65 years. The aim of the FELICITAR registry (Frailty Evaluation After List Inclusion, Characteristics and Influence on Transplantation and Results) is to assess the impact of frailty on prognosis before and after heart transplantation. A series of 100 patients from 3 Spanish centers will be included as soon as they are added to the national heart transplantation waiting list. Frailty will be evaluated again every 3 months until heart transplantation and at 3, 6, and 12 months thereafter. Depression, cognitive assessment, and quality of life also will be analyzed. The 2 primary endpoints are all-cause mortality and prevalence of frailty assessed using the Fried frailty index. Results from this study may show that frailty is frequent in patients with advanced heart failure listed for heart transplantation and is associated with a poor prognosis both before and after surgery. The findings may contribute to a better understanding of the characteristics of the optimal candidate for heart transplantation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.