Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29577181›Full record

ArticleIndian journal of pediatrics2019

A Comparative Evaluation of Presepsin with Procalcitonin and CRP in Diagnosing Neonatal Sepsis.

Neeraj Kumar, Rajeshwar Dayal, Pratibha Singh, Sunit Pathak, Vishal Pooniya, Ankur Goyal, Raj Kamal, K K Mohanty

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Indian journal of pediatrics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Procalcitonin versus C-reactive protein: review of kinetics and performance for diagnosis of neonatal sepsis.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2019
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Neeraj KumarDepartment of Pediatrics, Sarojini Naidu Medical College, Agra, India.
Rajeshwar DayalDepartment of Pediatrics, Sarojini Naidu Medical College, Agra, India.
Pratibha SinghDepartment of Pediatrics, Sarojini Naidu Medical College, Agra, India. headysmc06@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5443-8970
Sunit PathakDepartment of Pediatrics, FH Medical College, Tundla, India.
Vishal PooniyaDepartment of Pediatrics, King George's Medical University, Lucknow, India.
Ankur GoyalDepartment of Microbiology, Sarojini Naidu Medical College, Agra, India.
Raj KamalDepartment of Clinical Medicine, National JALMA Institute for Leprosy and other Mycobacterial Diseases (ICMR), Agra, India.
K K MohantyDepartment of Clinical Medicine, National JALMA Institute for Leprosy and other Mycobacterial Diseases (ICMR), Agra, India.
Sarojini Naidu Medical College · INNational JALMA Institute for Leprosy & Other Mycobacterial Diseases · INKing George's Medical University · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The objectives of this study were to study the clinical and biochemical profile of neonates with sepsis and to evaluate the diagnostic role of presepsin and its comparison with C-reactive protein (CRP) and Procalcitonin (PCT). This study was conducted from March 2015 through October 2016 in Neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) at S N Medical College, Agra. Neonates with ≥1 clinical features of sepsis and/or two risk factors were included. A total of 41 cases and 41 controls were taken. Blood sample was taken for all investigations. ROC curve analysis was performed. Out of 41 cases, 19 were blood culture positive, majority were males (68.3%), low birth weight (LBW: 70.7%) and preterms (53.6%). At chosen cut-off values, sensitivity of CRP, PCT and presepsin was 80.5%, 80.5%, 97.6% and specificity was 97.5%, 80.5%, 95.1% respectively. PCT and CRP were comparable as diagnostic markers of neonatal sepsis. Presepsin, in comparison with CRP and PCT has better sensitivity and negative predictive value (NPV).

Indexed as

BacteriaBiomarkersC-Reactive ProteinCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleFungiHumansInfant, NewbornIntensive Care Units, NeonatalLipopolysaccharide ReceptorsMaleNeonatal SepsisPeptide FragmentsProcalcitoninRisk FactorsROC CurveBiomarkersC-Reactive ProteinLipopolysaccharide ReceptorsPeptide Fragmentspresepsin protein, humanProcalcitoninComparisonCRPNeonatalPresepsinProcalcitoninSepsis

Identifiers

PMID29577181
OpenAlexW2793694665

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.