ArticleMedical & biological engineering & computing2018
Non-associative learning processes in vestibular nucleus.
Article in Medical & biological engineering & computing, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Neural Interruption by Unilateral Labyrinthectomy Biases the Directional Preference of Otolith-Related Vestibular Neurons.Brain sciences · 2021Article
- Dominant parameter of galvanic vestibular stimulation for the non-associative learning processes.Medical & biological engineering & computing · 2020Article
- Repeated Galvanic Vestibular Stimulation Modified the Neuronal Potential in the Vestibular Nucleus.Neural plasticity · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Simple non-associative learning processes, habituation and sensitization, are known to be systemically involved in different neurotransmissions, and these processes in the vestibular nucleus (VN) often show opposite responding patterns to repeated stimuli. However, their roles and mechanisms of the reciprocal responses at the cellular level are still elusive. Here, we conducted an electrophysiological experiment to investigate the neuronal responses to repeated stimuli in the VN, characterizing the neuronal responding patterns of habituation and sensitization. Based on our results, we also suggested an alternative hypothesis that these non-associative neuronal responses generated biased neural information based on simple linear addition. Sixty-seven neuronal responses to repeated stimuli were recorded from 23 guinea pigs, and the habituated and the sensitized responses were 37 (range of slopes - 3.66~- 0.02 spks/s/trial) and 30 (0.01~1.51 spks/s/trial), respectively. Unlike previous study, the general neuronal responding shapes were not exponential, but most (94%, 63/67) responding profiles were linear. Although no strong relation between the irregular and the high sensitivity in our population, the neuronal irregularity and sensitivity could be the core factors to cause the biased results to more habituated side. In conclusion, we found that a biased neural response (mean ± STD - 0.22 ± 0.89 spks/s/trial) was constructed by two non-associative neuronal responses based on a linear addition of the slopes. Graphical abstract Hypothesized and calculated neural mediation by non-associative learning processes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
29577174What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.