Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29576859›Full record

ArticleJournal of radiation oncology2018

Effectiveness and toxicity of conventional radiotherapy treatment for painful spinal metastases: a detailed course of side effects after opposing fields versus a single posterior field technique.

Paulien G Westhoff, Alexander de Graeff, Evelyn M Monninkhof, Ilse de Pree, Marco van Vulpen, Jan Willem H Leer, Corrie A M Marijnen, Yvette M van der Linden, Dutch Bone Metastasis Study Group

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of radiation oncology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Observational
  4. Metastasis Models: Thermodynamics and Complexity.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2024
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Factors affecting survival after palliative radiotherapy in patients with lung cancer.Reports of practical oncology and radiotherapy : journal of Greatpoland Cancer Center in Poznan and Polish Society of Radiation Oncology · 2021
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Paulien G Westhoff1Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, PO Box 85500, 3508 GA Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Alexander de Graeff3Department of Medical Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, PO Box 85500, 3508 GA Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Evelyn M Monninkhof4Julius center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, PO Box 85500, 3508 GA Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Ilse de Pree5Department of Radiation Oncology, Erasmus Medical Center, PO Box 5201, 3008 AE Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Marco van Vulpen1Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, PO Box 85500, 3508 GA Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Jan Willem H Leer2Department of Radiation Oncology, Radboud University Medical Center, PO Box 9101, 6500 HB Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
Corrie A M Marijnen6Department of Radiation Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, PO Box 9600, 2300 RC Leiden, the Netherlands.
Yvette M van der Linden6Department of Radiation Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, PO Box 9600, 2300 RC Leiden, the Netherlands.
Dutch Bone Metastasis Study Group
Radboud University Nijmegen · NLErasmus MC · NLLeiden University Medical Center · NLUtrecht University · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundConventional radiotherapy for painful spinal metastases can be delivered with a single posterior-anterior (PA) or two opposed anterior-posterior (APPA) fields. We studied the effectiveness and toxicity of both techniques and studied whether treatment technique was predictive for abdominal and skin toxicity. PATIENTS AND

methodsWithin the Dutch Bone Metastasis Study, 343 patients received 8 Gray in a single fraction or 24 Gray in six fractions for painful spinal metastases. Treatment technique was not randomized. At baseline and weekly during follow-up, patients reported pain and other physical complaints. Any complaint increasing within 4 weeks after treatment was noted as a side effect. Pain response was calculated according to international standards, taking into account changes in pain score and medication. Repeated measurement analyses and multivariate logistic analyses were performed.

resultsPatients were mainly treated on the thoracic (34%) and lumbar (53%) spine and 73% received a PA field. Pain response was similar between both techniques (74%). In patients treated at the thoraco-lumbar and lumbar spine, with multiple fractions, significantly more abdominal complaints were noticed. In multivariate analysis, radiotherapy technique did not predict for side effects.

conclusionConventional radiotherapy of painful spinal metastases provides limited toxicity. Radiotherapy technique is not an independent predictor of abdominal and skin toxicity of irradiation.

Indexed as

Bone metastasesPalliative radiotherapySide effectsSpinal metastasesToxicity

Identifiers

PMID29576859
PMCPMC5856865
OpenAlexW2754727794

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.