ArticleBiomicrofluidics2018
A rapid and meshless analytical model of acoustofluidic pressure fields for waveguide design.
Article in Biomicrofluidics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.
- Numerical Modeling Using Immersed Boundary-Lattice Boltzmann Method and Experiments for Particle Manipulation under Standing Surface Acoustic Waves.Micromachines · 2023Article
- A deep learning approach for designed diffraction-based acoustic patterning in microchannels.Scientific reports · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Acoustofluidics has a strong pedigree in microscale manipulation, with particle and cell separation and patterning arising from acoustic pressure gradients. Acoustic waveguides are a promising candidate for localizing force fields in microfluidic devices, for which computational modelling is an important design tool. Meshed finite element analysis is a popular approach for this, yet its computation time increases rapidly when complex geometries are used, limiting its usefulness. Here, we present an analytical model of the acoustic pressure field in a microchannel arising from a surface acoustic wave (SAW) boundary condition that computes in milliseconds and provide the simulation code in the supplementary material. Unlike finite element analysis, the computation time of our model is independent of microchannel or waveguide shape, making it ideal for designing and optimising microscale waveguide structures. We provide experimental validation of our model with cases including near-field acoustic patterning of microparticles from a travelling SAW and two-dimensional patterning from a standing SAW and explore the design of waveguides for localised particle or cell capture.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.