Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29576465›Full record

ArticleTrends in cognitive sciences2018

Getting Serious about Variation: Lessons for Clinical Neuroscience (A Commentary on 'The Myth of Optimality in Clinical Neuroscience').

Alexander J Shackman, Andrew S Fox

Abstract readLetterComment
In one paragraph

Article in Trends in cognitive sciences, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. The Amygdala and Depression: A Sober Reconsideration.The American journal of psychiatry · 2022
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. A Hierarchical Taxonomy of Psychopathology Can Transform Mental Health Research.Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science · 2019
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Alexander J ShackmanDepartment of Psychology, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742, USA; Neuroscience and Cognitive Science Program, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742, USA; Maryland Neuroimaging Center, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742 USA; Both authors contributed equally to this work; the order of authors was determined by a coin flip. Electronic address: shackman@umd.edu.
Andrew S FoxDepartment of Psychology, University of California, Davis, CA 95616, USA; California National Primate Research Center, University of California, Davis, CA 95616, USA; Both authors contributed equally to this work; the order of authors was determined by a coin flip. Electronic address: dfox@ucdavis.edu.

Funding

National Institute on Aging (NIA) ColonyP51OD011107 · OD · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT DAVIS · PI Simon J. Atkinson · 2012 to 2026
$191.5M
Prospective Determination of Neurobehavioral Risk for the Development of Emotion DisordersR01MH107444 · NIMH · UNIV OF MARYLAND, COLLEGE PARK · PI SHACKMAN, ALEXANDER JOSEPH · 2016 to 2020
$3.4M
The Role of Anxiety-Related Brain Circuits in Tobacco Dependence and WithdrawalR21DA040717 · NIDA · UNIV OF MARYLAND, COLLEGE PARK · PI SHACKMAN, ALEXANDER JOSEPH · 2016 to 2017
$418k
NIDA NIH HHS R21 DA040717NIH HHS P51 OD011107NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH107444
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

NeuroimagingNeurosciencesaffective and translational neurosciencebiological psychiatryclinical neuroscienceindividual differencesneuroimaging

Identifiers

PMID29576465
PMCPMC5911206

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.