Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29576029›Full record

ReviewPublic health nutrition2018

A review of guidance on fish consumption in pregnancy: is it fit for purpose?

Caroline M Taylor, Pauline M Emmett, Alan M Emond, Jean Golding

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Public health nutrition, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 57 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Contamination of breast milk with lead, mercury, arsenic, and cadmium in Iran: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Biometals : an international journal on the role of metal ions in biology, biochemistry, and medicine · 2022
    Pooled it
  3. Prenatal Mercury Exposure and Neurodevelopment up to the Age of 5 Years: A Systematic Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Pooled it
  4. Mercury and Prenatal Growth: A Systematic Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Mercury Exposure in Women of Reproductive Age in Rondônia State, Amazon Region, Brazil.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Caroline M TaylorCentre for Child and Adolescent Health,Population Health Sciences,Bristol Medical School,University of Bristol,Oakfield House,Oakfield Grove,Bristol BS8 2BN,UK.ORCID 0000-0001-8347-5092
Pauline M EmmettCentre for Child and Adolescent Health,Population Health Sciences,Bristol Medical School,University of Bristol,Oakfield House,Oakfield Grove,Bristol BS8 2BN,UK.
Alan M EmondCentre for Child and Adolescent Health,Population Health Sciences,Bristol Medical School,University of Bristol,Oakfield House,Oakfield Grove,Bristol BS8 2BN,UK.
Jean GoldingCentre for Child and Adolescent Health,Population Health Sciences,Bristol Medical School,University of Bristol,Oakfield House,Oakfield Grove,Bristol BS8 2BN,UK.
University of Bristol · GB

Funding

Wellcome Trust 104077
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivePublic health messages to reduce Hg exposure for pregnant women have focused exclusively on advice on fish consumption to limit Hg exposure, with little account being taken of the positive contribution of fish to nutritional quality. The aim of the present review was to compare and contrast the content and presentation of national guidelines on fish consumption in pregnancy, and comment on their evidence base and impact on consumption.

designWe searched for national and international guidelines on fish consumption in pregnancy using Internet search strategies. The detailed content and style of presentation of the guidelines were compared. The evidence base for the guidelines, and evidence for the impact of the guidelines on fish consumption levels, were assessed.

resultsWe identified nineteen national guidelines and three international guidelines. There was great variation in the content, complexity and presentation style. The guidelines were based largely on the Hg content of fish with far less consideration being given to the positive beneficial effects of nutrients provided by fish. The complexity of the guidelines may lead to pregnant women reducing their fish intake, or not eating fish at all.

conclusionsGuidelines on fish consumption in pregnancy should take the beneficial effects of fish into account. Guidelines need to be clear and memorable, and appropriately disseminated, to achieve impact. Guidelines could include visual rather than narrative content. Use of technology, for example apps, could enable women to record their fish consumption in real time and log compliance with guidance over a week or other time period.

Indexed as

FishesNutrition PolicyAdultAnimalsFemaleHealth PromotionHumansMercuryPregnancyPrenatal CarePublic HealthSeafoodMercuryAdvisoriesFishGuidelinesMercuryPregnancyReview

Identifiers

PMID29576029
PMCPMC6033312
OpenAlexW2792317807

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.