Standards for Medical Device Cybersecurity in 2018.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

1. Cybersecurity vulnerability analysis of medical devices purchased by national health services.Scientific reports · 2023
   Article
2. Security Risks and User Perception towards Adopting Wearable Internet of Medical Things.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
   Article
3. Six Digital Health Technologies That Will Transform Diabetes.Journal of diabetes science and technology · 2023
   Article
4. Embedded Sensor Systems in Medical Devices: Requisites and Challenges Ahead.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
   Article
5. Digital Connectivity: The Sixth Vital Sign.Journal of diabetes science and technology · 2022
   Article
6. Deep brain stimulation and electromagnetic interference.Clinical neurology and neurosurgery · 2021
   Review

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as