Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29575819›Full record

SynthesisThoracic cancer2018

PIK3CA mutations and their response to neoadjuvant treatment in early breast cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Hongwei Fan, Chao Li, Qian Xiang, Ling Xu, Zhuo Zhang, Qianxin Liu, Tonttong Zhang, Ying Zhou, Xia Zhao, Yimin Cui

Open access · goldAbstract readMeta-AnalysisReview
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Thoracic cancer, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Hongwei FanDepartment of Pharmacy, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, China.ORCID 0000-0002-8004-3590
Chao LiDepartment of Pharmacy, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, China.
Qian XiangDepartment of Pharmacy, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, China.
Ling XuBreast Disease Center, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, China.
Zhuo ZhangDepartment of Pharmacy, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, China.
Qianxin LiuDepartment of Pharmacy, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, China.
Tonttong ZhangNational Cancer Center/Cancer Hospital & Shenzhen Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China.
Ying ZhouDepartment of Pharmacy, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, China.
Xia ZhaoDepartment of Pharmacy, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, China.
Yimin CuiDepartment of Pharmacy, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, China.
Peking University · CNChinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPIK3CA mutations frequently occur in breast cancer patients. This study was conducted to evaluate the relationship between PIK3CA mutations and neoadjuvant treatment response and to analyze the clinical implications.

methodsPubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane database were searched for relevant studies in September 2017. The pooled risk ratio (RR) was estimated using fixed effects or random effects models according to heterogeneity among studies.

resultsThis meta-analysis included 20 studies with 4392 patients. The pooled RR showed that PIK3CA mutation is correlated to lower pathological complete response (pCR) in unselected HER2+ patients (RR = 0.73; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.66-0.81), thus the predictive value of PIK3CA status may be stronger in HER2+/HR+ patients (RR = 0.50; 95% CI 0.27-0.93) and those administered dual-targeting treatment (RR = 0.55; 95% CI 0.39-0.78). In contrast with wild type, either exon 9 (RR = 0.55; 95% CI 0.39-0.78) or exon 20 (RR = 0.71; 95% CI 0.58-0.89) mutations were significantly associated with lower pCR. The predictive value of exon 9 mutations was not significantly greater than exon 20 mutations (RR = 0.76; 95% CI 0.51-1.13).

conclusionIn early breast cancer, PIK3CA mutations seem to identify HER2+ patients who are less likely to reach pCR. The clinical implications of PIK3CA mutations tend to vary between exon 9 and exon 20. This mechanism should be explored in further studies.

Indexed as

Biomarkers, TumorBreast NeoplasmsClass I Phosphatidylinositol 3-KinasesDisease-Free SurvivalErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesExonsFemaleHumansMutationNeoadjuvant TherapyNeoplasm StagingBiomarkers, TumorClass I Phosphatidylinositol 3-KinasesERBB2 protein, humanErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesPIK3CA protein, humanBreast cancerneoadjuvant treatmentPI3K pathwayPIK3CA

Identifiers

PMID29575819
PMCPMC5928352
OpenAlexW2791431451

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.