ArticleThoracic cancer2018
Analysis of the activity and safety of weekly low-dose bevacizumab-based regimens in heavily pretreated patients with metastatic breast cancer.
Article in Thoracic cancer, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCurrently, there are no standard regimens for metastatic breast cancer patients (MBC) who have failed ≥ 3 chemotherapy treatments. The aim of this study was to assess whether weekly low-dose bevacizumab-based regimens were well tolerated and would improve efficacy in MBC patients who had failed numerous therapies.
methodsSeventeen patients with MBC who were heavily pretreated with a median of five regimens of therapy (range 1-10) between 2012 and 2016 were included in the analysis. Bevacizumab was administered at a dose of 100 mg intravenously once a week combined with one or two types of chemotherapeutic drugs until confirmed disease progression or an intolerable adverse event was observed. Patient characteristics, objective response rate, clinical benefit rate, progression-free survival, and toxicity were assessed.
resultsAll 17 patients had been pretreated with taxane-based and anthracycline-based chemotherapy. Weekly low-dose bevacizumab combined with one or two types of chemotherapeutic drugs, which had usually not been previously used (e.g. etoposide, irinotecan, pemetrexed, methotrexate, and nab-paclitaxel), was administered. Three patients achieved a partial response, while one had stable disease for > 24 weeks, and the clinical benefit rate was 23.5%. Median progression-free survival was 3.4 months (95% confidence interval 2.0-4.8). The most common hematological adverse events were neutropenia, anemia, and thrombocytopenia. Bevacizumab-related adverse events included grade 1 bleeding (17.6%) and grade 2 hypertension (5.9%).
conclusionsWeekly low-dose bevacizumab combined with chemotherapy shows a relatively favorable clinical response and tolerable toxicity, providing a feasible option for heavily pretreated MBC patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.