Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29575241›Full record

Trial reportDiabetic medicine : a journal of the British Diabetic Association2018

Randomized controlled feasibility trial of supported self-management in adults with Type 2 diabetes mellitus and an intellectual disability: OK Diabetes.

A House, L Bryant, A M Russell, A Wright-Hughes, L Graham, R Walwyn, J M Wright, C Hulme, J L O'Dwyer, G Latchford and 3 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Diabetic medicine : a journal of the British Diabetic Association, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

A HouseLeeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-8721-8026
L BryantLeeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-1972-7395
A M RussellLeeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
A Wright-HughesClinical Trials Research Unit, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
L GrahamClinical Trials Research Unit, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
R WalwynClinical Trials Research Unit, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
J M WrightLeeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
C HulmeLeeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
J L O'DwyerLeeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
G LatchfordLeeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
A StansfieldLeeds York Partnerships NHS Foundation Trust, Leeds, UK.
R AjjanDivision of Cardiovascular and Diabetes Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
A FarrinClinical Trials Research Unit, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
University of Leeds · GBLeeds and York Partnership NHS Foundation Trust · GB

Funding

Department of Health 10/102/03
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsTo undertake a feasibility randomized controlled trial of supported self-management vs treatment as usual in a population of adults with obesity, Type 2 diabetes and an intellectual disability.

methodsWe conducted an individually randomized feasibility trial. Participants were adults aged >18 years with a mild or moderate intellectual disability, living in the community with Type 2 diabetes, on any therapy other than insulin. Participants had mental capacity to consent to research and the intervention. Inclusion criteria included HbA

resultsA total of 82 participants (89% of those contacted and eligible) were randomized. All supported self-management sessions were completed by 35/41 participants (85%); only four completed no sessions. Data on the follow-up candidate primary outcomes HbA

conclusionsAdherence to supported self-management and willingness to have blood taken for outcome measurement was good. A definitive randomized controlled trial is feasible in this population. (Trial registration: Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN41897033).

Indexed as

AffectBlood PressureBody Mass IndexDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2Feasibility StudiesFemaleGlycated HemoglobinHouse CallsHumansIntellectual DisabilityMaleMedication AdherenceMiddle AgedObesitySelf-ManagementSocial SupportGlycated Hemoglobin

Identifiers

PMID29575241
PMCPMC5969288
OpenAlexW2791599193

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.