Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29575226›Full record

ArticlePharmacoepidemiology and drug safety2018

Discontinuation and dose adjustment of metoprolol after metoprolol-paroxetine/fluoxetine co-prescription in Dutch elderly.

Muh Akbar Bahar, Yuanyuan Wang, Jens H J Bos, Bob Wilffert, Eelko Hak

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pharmacoepidemiology and drug safety, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Muh Akbar BaharGroningen Research Institute of Pharmacy, Department of PharmacoTherapy, -Epidemiology and -Economics, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-6582-5615
Yuanyuan WangGroningen Research Institute of Pharmacy, Department of PharmacoTherapy, -Epidemiology and -Economics, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Jens H J BosGroningen Research Institute of Pharmacy, Department of PharmacoTherapy, -Epidemiology and -Economics, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Bob WilffertGroningen Research Institute of Pharmacy, Department of PharmacoTherapy, -Epidemiology and -Economics, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Eelko HakGroningen Research Institute of Pharmacy, Department of PharmacoTherapy, -Epidemiology and -Economics, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
University of Groningen · NLUniversity Medical Center Groningen · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeCo-prescription of paroxetine/fluoxetine (a strong CYP2D6 inhibitor) in metoprolol (a CYP2D6 substrate) users is common, but data on the clinical consequences of this drug-drug interaction are limited and inconclusive. Therefore, we assessed the effect of paroxetine/fluoxetine initiation on the existing treatment with metoprolol on the discontinuation and dose adjustment of metoprolol among elderly.

methodsWe performed a cohort study using the University of Groningen IADB.nl prescription database (www.IADB.nl). We selected all elderly (≥60 years) who had ever been prescribed metoprolol and had a first co-prescription of paroxetine/fluoxetine, citalopram (weak CYP2D6 inhibitor), or mirtazapine (negative control) from 1994 to 2015. The exposure group was metoprolol and paroxetine/fluoxetine co-prescription, and the other groups acted as controls. The outcomes were early discontinuation and dose adjustment of metoprolol. Logistic regression was applied to estimate adjusted odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI).

resultsCombinations of metoprolol-paroxetine/fluoxetine, metoprolol-citalopram, and metoprolol-mirtazapine were started in 528, 673, and 625 patients, respectively. Compared with metoprolol-citalopram, metoprolol-paroxetine/fluoxetine was not significantly associated with the early discontinuation and dose adjustment of metoprolol (OR = 1.07, 95% CI:0.77-1.48; OR = 0.87, 95% CI:0.57-1.33, respectively). In comparison with metoprolol-mirtazapine, metoprolol-paroxetine/fluoxetine was associated with a significant 43% relative increase in early discontinuation of metoprolol (OR = 1.43, 95% CI:1.01-2.02) but no difference in the risk of dose adjustment. Stratified analysis by gender showed that women have a significantly high risk of metoprolol early discontinuation (OR = 1.62, 95% CI:1.03-2.53).

conclusionParoxetine/fluoxetine initiation in metoprolol prescriptions, especially for female older patients, is associated with the risk of early discontinuation of metoprolol.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overCitalopramCohort StudiesCytochrome P-450 CYP2D6Cytochrome P-450 CYP2D6 InhibitorsDose-Response Relationship, DrugDrug InteractionsDrug PrescriptionsDrug Therapy, CombinationFemaleFluoxetineHumansMaleMetoprololMiddle AgedCitalopramCytochrome P-450 CYP2D6Cytochrome P-450 CYP2D6 InhibitorsFluoxetineMetoprololMirtazapineParoxetinecitalopramCYP2D6drug-drug interactions (DDI)metoprololmirtazapineparoxetine/fluoxetinepharmacoepidemiology

Identifiers

PMID29575226
PMCPMC6001522
OpenAlexW2791509254

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.