Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29574936›Full record

ArticleJournal of cellular physiology2018

Analysis of tumoral spheres growing in a multichamber microfluidic device.

Denise Belgorosky, Tamara Fernández-Cabada, Ana Belén Peñaherrera-Pazmiño, Yanina Langle, Ross Booth, Shekhar Bhansali, Maximiliano S Pérez, Ana María Eiján, Betiana Lerner

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cellular physiology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Denise BelgoroskyInstituto de Oncología Angel H. Roffo, Universidad de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Tamara Fernández-CabadaFellow at Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET), Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Ana Belén Peñaherrera-PazmiñoFellow at Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET), Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Yanina LangleInstituto de Oncología Angel H. Roffo, Universidad de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Ross BoothMillipore Sigma Corporation, Hayward, California.
Shekhar BhansaliBio-MEMS and Microsystem Lab, Department of Electrical Engineering, University of South Florida, Tampa, Florida.
Maximiliano S PérezUniversidad Tecnológica Nacional (UTN), Facultad Regional de Haedo, Paris, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Ana María EijánInstituto de Oncología Angel H. Roffo, Universidad de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Betiana LernerUniversidad Tecnológica Nacional (UTN), Facultad Regional de Haedo, Paris, Buenos Aires, Argentina.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7038-6442

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Lab on a Chip (LOC) farming systems have emerged as a powerful tool for single cell studies combined with a non-adherent cell culture substrate and single cell capture chips for the study of single cell derived tumor spheres. Cancer is characterized by its cellular heterogeneity where only a small population of cancer stem cells (CSCs) are responsible for tumor metastases and recurrences. Thus, the in vitro strategy to the formation of a single cell-derived sphere is an attractive alternative to identify CSCs. In this study, we test the effectiveness of microdevices for analysis of heterogeneity within CSC populations and its interaction with different components of the extracellular matrix. CSC could be identify using specific markers related to its pluripotency and self-renewal characteristics such as the transcription factor Oct-4 or the surface protein CD44. The results confirm the usefulness of LOC as an effective method for quantification of CSC, through the formation of spheres under conditions of low adhesion or growing on components of the extracellular matrix. The device used is also a good alternative for evaluating the individual growth of each sphere and further identification of these CSC markers by immunofluorescence. In conclusion, LOC devices have not only the already known advantages, but they are also a promising tool since they use small amounts of reagents and are under specific culture parameters. LOC devices could be considered as a novel technology to be used as a complement or replacement of traditional studies on culture plates.

Indexed as

AnimalsBiomarkers, TumorCell Culture TechniquesCell Line, TumorCell ProliferationExtracellular MatrixHyaluronan ReceptorsLab-On-A-Chip DevicesMiceNeoplastic Stem CellsOctamer Transcription Factor-3Spheroids, CellularBiomarkers, TumorHyaluronan ReceptorsOctamer Transcription Factor-3cancer stem cellCD44lab on a chipOct-4sphere formation assaytumoral sphere

Identifiers

PMID29574936
PMCPMC13482429

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.