Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29574632›Full record

ArticleJournal of computational neuroscience2018

An integrate-and-fire model to generate spike trains with long-range dependence.

Alexandre Richard, Patricio Orio, Etienne Tanré

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of computational neuroscience, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Alexandre RichardCentraleSupélec, Université Paris-Saclay, Laboratoire MICS et Fédération CNRS - FR3487, Gif-sur-Yvette, France. alexandre.richard@centralesupelec.fr.ORCID 0000-0001-7828-6959
Patricio OrioInstituto de Neurociencia, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad de Valparaíso, Valparaiso, Chile.
Etienne TanréUniversité Côte d'Azur, Inria, 2004 Route des Lucioles BP 93, 06902, Sophia-Antipolis, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Long-range dependence (LRD) has been observed in a variety of phenomena in nature, and for several years also in the spiking activity of neurons. Often, this is interpreted as originating from a non-Markovian system. Here we show that a purely Markovian integrate-and-fire (IF) model, with a noisy slow adaptation term, can generate interspike intervals (ISIs) that appear as having LRD. However a proper analysis shows that this is not the case asymptotically. For comparison, we also consider a new model of individual IF neuron with fractional (non-Markovian) noise. The correlations of its spike trains are studied and proven to have LRD, unlike classical IF models. On the other hand, to correctly measure long-range dependence, it is usually necessary to know if the data are stationary. Thus, a methodology to evaluate stationarity of the ISIs is presented and applied to the various IF models. We explain that Markovian IF models may seem to have LRD because of non-stationarities.

Indexed as

Models, NeurologicalAction PotentialsHumansNeuronsNoiseStochastic ProcessesInterspike interval statisticsLong-range dependenceStationarityStochastic integrate-and-fire model

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.