ReviewCurrent cardiology reports2018
Genetic Risk Prediction for Primary and Secondary Prevention of Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease: an Update.
Review in Current cardiology reports, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Body mass index interacts with a genetic-risk score for depression increasing the risk of the disease in high-susceptibility individuals.Translational psychiatry · 2022Pooled it
- Common genetic variants do not predict recurrent events in coronary heart disease patients.BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2022Trial
- Interferon Regulatory Factor 5 (Biomolecules · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purpose of reviewThis review aims to summarize the research on genetic risk scores and their ability to improve risk prediction in both a primary and a secondary prevention population. RECENT
findingsSeveral groups have examined the role of genetic scores in different patient populations. Recent studies have capitalized on the growing number of identified genetic variants to construct polygenic risk scores that include hundreds and sometimes thousands of SNPs. Also, recent studies have demonstrated that individuals with high genetic risk scores can attenuate their risk with lifestyle modifications and with statins, for which the benefit of treatment may be greater in those at highest genetic risk. Genetic risk scores when added to existing clinical models appear to improve risk prediction, particularly in the setting of incident cardiovascular disease and may provide actionable information to optimize prevention early in life. Future research will need to establish how to best use this genetic risk information either as a means to further individualize treatment decisions or to better identify high-risk populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
29574623What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.