Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29574609›Full record

ArticleJournal of assisted reproduction and genetics2018

Outcome of immature oocytes collection of 119 cancer patients during ovarian tissue harvesting for fertility preservation.

Alon Kedem, Gil M Yerushalmi, Masha Brengauz, Hila Raanani, Raoul Orvieto, Ariel Hourvitz, Dror Meirow

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
4.8field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 51 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Alon KedemIVF Unit, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Chaim Sheba Medical Center, Tel-Hashomer, and Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.
Gil M YerushalmiIVF Unit, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Chaim Sheba Medical Center, Tel-Hashomer, and Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.
Masha BrengauzIVF Unit, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Chaim Sheba Medical Center, Tel-Hashomer, and Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.
Hila RaananiIVF Unit, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Chaim Sheba Medical Center, Tel-Hashomer, and Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.
Raoul OrvietoIVF Unit, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Chaim Sheba Medical Center, Tel-Hashomer, and Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.
Ariel HourvitzIVF Unit, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Chaim Sheba Medical Center, Tel-Hashomer, and Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.
Dror MeirowIVF Unit, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Chaim Sheba Medical Center, Tel-Hashomer, and Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel. meirow@post.tau.ac.il.
Sheba Medical Center · ILTel Aviv University · IL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeFew clinical options for fertility preservation are available to females with cancer, and data about clinical outcomes is limited. Potential supplementary approaches to fertility preservation include retrieval of immature oocytes followed by in vitro maturation (IVM) and storage. The aim of this study was to evaluate post-thawing outcomes of immature oocytes collected both by transvaginal aspiration and from excised ovarian tissue.

methodsWe conducted a retrospective cohort study of patients treated in a single tertiary center. We reviewed the records of 119 cancer patients who underwent ovarian tissue cryopreservation and immature oocyte harvesting for fertility preservation. All embryos and oocytes that were frozen and thawed were included in the study. Post-thawing outcomes were evaluated.

resultsThirty-five stored embryos from eight patients were thawed. Twenty-nine embryos survived (82% survival rate) and were transferred. Six oocytes were thawed, two oocytes survived, and no oocytes were fertilized. Only one PCOS patient became pregnant, resulting in the normal delivery of a healthy baby.

conclusionsAlthough a relatively high number of mature oocytes and embryos can be stored with the combined procedure, the limited rate of pregnancies represents a poor reproductive outcome. Therefore, this approach should be reserved for special groups with limited options.

Indexed as

NeoplasmsAdolescentAdultChildCryopreservationEmbryo TransferFemaleFertility PreservationHumansIn Vitro Oocyte Maturation TechniquesOocyte RetrievalOvaryPregnancyRetrospective StudiesTissue and Organ HarvestingTreatment OutcomeFertility preservationIn vitro oocyte maturationOocyte retrieval

Identifiers

PMID29574609
PMCPMC5984891
OpenAlexW2789797619

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.